There’s a lot riding on “The Avengers”; not just a big chunk of cash but also no fewer than three franchises.
And it’s pretty much exactly what you want out of an “Avengers” movie; this is pure popcorn entertainment. It takes a little while to get completely warmed up, but once it does, it’s a hell of a ride.
Perhaps the best thing about “The Avengers” is that it’s a huge movie that doesn’t assume its audience is incredibly stupid, and isn’t scared of leaving non-comics fans in the dark while avoiding anything that would make the script incomprehensible. There are problems, here and there, but the movie itself has a tight, well-written script, the cast works well together, and the action setpieces, especially the finale, are pitch-perfect.
Standing out especially in the cast is Mark Ruffalo, not least because The Hulk gets all the funniest bits in the movie, and Tom Hiddleston, who has to sell Loki as maniacal yet insecure and does a great job. A nice touch to the script is that Whedon keeps ratcheting up the stakes without being obvious about it, and as a writer, isn’t afraid to kick his characters in the gut.
We’ll get into a little more detail under the cut, but suffice to say that since a fair chunk of you reading have already seen it, we’re not going to avoid spoilers. So, if you go no further: “The Avengers” is a hell of a lot of fun, and well worth seeing.
There are, as we said, a few minor problems. The first and most basic is that Joss Whedon is, well, a fairly pedestrian director. It’s not anything resembling a deal-breaker, but he’s really more comfortable working with actors doing funny or dramatic bits, and honestly, the movie’s better in its smaller moments, like Black Widow’s introduction, than it is with some of the larger bits. It stands out in a series of movies that have guys like Jon Favreau and Kenneth Branaugh behind the wheel.
And as tight as the script is, there are a few minor plot holes: Tony Stark should really put together a major plot moment together way, way, sooner than he does, for example, and characters have moments where they really should be smarter; Loki is fairly transparent in this movie.
Also, it does bother me that I suspected for months that Whedon was going to off a character and that it was easy to figure out who; killing a semi-major character is on the verge of becoming shtick for him, so Coulson spends pretty much the entire movie with a target on his back. That said, Clark Gregg does at least get some good moments, and hopefully, the rumors of his becoming The Vision are true.
Finally, the script slows down a bit once the team gets together on the Helicarrier. Whedon does a good job of maintaining narrative momentum and tweaking cliches, but the reality is, the middle of this movie is about half an hour of people taking meetings. Fortunately, Whedon excels at this kind of stuff, so it’s funny and it never loses pace, but it’s still a bit irritating that Marvel can’t shake this formula even for a movie that’s a guaranteed hit.
That said, the movie makes some really smart decisions that, amazingly, the trailer didn’t spoil. Whedon’s at his best subverting cliches, something he spends a lot of time doing.
Is “The Avengers” a classic movie? No. Ultimately, it plays it a little too safe. But it’s smart, it’s fun, and it’s engaging. It’s Marvel Studios at its best, up there with the first “Iron Man”. If you’ve been waiting for this movie for months or even years, you won’t be disappointed.




Fairer review than Filmdrunks, Vision rumours sound interesting!
I doubt the Vision idea. It’s way to early for there to be any notion of what the final script for Avengers 2 or Iron Man 3 is going to be. I’m pretty sure that rumor started when it was “leaked” by an “inside source” that Coulson becoming the Vision was the post-credit scene. An obviously that didn’t happen.
I think that the marketing should have held back from that scene in the trailer of Hulk catching Tony. I’ve never been to a movie where there was so much clapping and cheering during the film before, and I think that moment would have blown the roof off if we hadn’t seen it all coming.
I’m just thankfully more of it wasn’t ruined. The opening alone was full of surprises.
Not saying that I’m convinced its a goer, but when you consider the theme of self aware armour is, lets face it, damn likely a theme in the next Iron Man, a Vision is definitely plausible…and Coulson head sure does look like Vision
I was going to say, they spent a lot of time setting Coulson up, the Vision is kind of a key character to the team, it’d be odd to just throw that all away.
Dumb question so feel free to bash me about the head and shoulders if the answer is painfully obvious but..
In the poster Stark is shown wearing a circular chest arc yet in 2 he obviously upgraded to the delta shaped one. Misstep in poster collage-ing or is it addressed in the film?
Again, not a huge deal one way or the other but it’s been gnawing at me for some time now.
Thanks. I’ll hang up and listen.
It makes sense in the movie. When you see it you’ll understand.
Right on. Thanks.
The plot point you mentioned Stark should’ve gotten earlier: SHIELD trying to weaponize the Tesseract?
No, the fact that the tesseract needs a huge power source, and he just fired up the fucking arc reactor. I mean, come on, he’s arrogant, but not THAT arrogant.
I want to watch Hulk trouncing Loki over and over. My mind couldn’t decide if it wanted to laugh or shout out ‘holy. fucking. shit.’
I went to a showing that was half knowledgeable fanboys and half “DON’T OPEN THAT DOOR, THE KILLER’S IN THERE!” types. Some of the finer points of the dialogue was lost to the overly raucous laughing and/or applauding, but it was worth it for the audible gasp when Thanos turned around in the first post-credits scene.
Yeah, if Marvel’s pulling that trigger, the second Avengers will be just as awesome as the first.
Also, shawarma sales probably will go through the roof this weekend.
My position is that Coulson didn’t die. They’re spies, they lie. It was telegraphed pretty early in the movie. Especially because Clark Gregg has more or less confirmed he’ll be in future Marvel films.
Fair enough review, but I think calling Whedon’s direction pedestrian isn’t at all accurate. The climax of this movie is very comprable to all three of Bay’s Transformer movies but instead of being a action fatigue inducing mess that makes no visual sense – Whedon gives us 40+ minutes of ever evolving, constantly changing, perfectly pitched action, comedy and drama. That guy knows who to pase a film.
Whedon has a few good moments in the movie, and he’s not bad overall, but he’s not Christopher Nolan.
The thing with Nolan is that while the guy does have vision, style and is a technical master, what he is lacking is heart. Now I know that sounds more like a writing thing, but he just doesn’t know how to bring the feelings. I’m take the Joker out of TDK and that movie would have no emotional punch what so ever.
INCEPTION for example is excelent as an excercise is structural perfection – but there’s hardly a moment of dialogue that isn’t pure exposition.
The dude has no soul.
Not to mention the fact that he is one of the main offenders when it comes to shaky cam.
Whedon on the other hand may not have the technical wizardry down pat, but he knows how to make it work as a whole.
I see your complaint, and raise you the ending of “Inception”. Don’t tell me you didn’t care, that you didn’t want to see something for Cobb one way or the other.
Also, he’s nowhere close to the main offender on shakycam.
Did care come the end because I won’t deny the movie’s Wow factor for a second. Just don’t know if I really ‘felt’ anything.
Yeah fair enough, I guess next to Greengrass his movies look like stage plays.