
2012 was a big year to be a geek, nerd and/or poindexter. This is the year geek culture went mainstream. Like, really, really mainstream. It wasn't all roses though -- there were still plenty of legitimate reasons for nerdrage this year.
We got our rundown of the best and worst of geek culture in 2012 started last week, and now after an unfortunate delay due to me contracting some form of the Andromeda Strain, it's time for part two...

Best: People Buy Comics Not Published By DC or Marvel
Sure, Marvel and DC still dominate the landscape, but 2012 felt like the first time in a long time comics without the words "Batman", "Spider-Man" or "X-Men" scored any sort of significant coverage or sales figures.
Of course The Walking Dead continued to be a phenomenon, but Image also scored breakout successes with Saga, Fatale and Happy. Dark Horse's Hellboy universe stuff continues it's momentum, and they snuck some new hits like The Massive and Mind MGMT in under the radar as well. Oh, and are you reading BOOM! Studios' Adventure Time comics? You should -- everybody's doing it.
Don't get me wrong, I don't have anything against the big two publishers, but variety is good. Right now only around a third of my pull list is DC and Marvel stuff -- that's the symbol of a healthy comic book industry.

Worst: Vertigo Is On Death's Door
Unfortunately as the rest of the comic book industry blooms, DC seems intent on killing off what was the most consistent source of top-quality, mature, creator-driven comics during the industry's long fallow period. Iconic Vertigo characters like Swamp Thing and John Constantine are being poached for DC's mainline universe, long-time imprint mastermind Karen Berger is leaving the company and upcoming Vertigo solicits look particularly bleak.
On the one hand, you could make the point that the comic book industry has grown up and changed and doesn't need Vertigo anymore, but still, it'll be unfortunate if DC lets the imprint become a husk like Marvel's ignored, under-utilized MAX line. Unfortunate for DC more than anybody -- most of the company's top talent like Grant Morrison, Brian Azzarello, Scott Snyder, Jeff Lemire, Cliff Chiang, J.H. Williams and more came up through the Vertigo farm system.

Best: The Wii U Arrived and It Was Good
Nintendo's Wii U has had some early hiccups, but for the most part it's a well-designed kick off the next generation of consoles. The GamePad controller is beautiful, playing console games across two screens has a lot of potential, and asymmetric multiplayer is actually a lot of fun.
Really, if you're even a marginal Nintendo fan the Wii U is worth looking into -- it's certainly better and more promising than either the Wii or Gamecube. In fact, it may be Nintendo's best system since the SNES glory days, and considering some of the wacky, virtual reality rumors swirling about the next Playstation and Xbox, the Wii U may also end up being the most grounded, least gimmicky console of this generation. Been a while since you could say that about a Nintendo system, huh?

Worst: Diablo III Arrived and It Wasn't Good
So, Diablo III's launch was a jolly rolling ball of disasters. Server crashes, broken patches, exploits, hackers -- the game saw it all. Then things settled down a bit and people actually got to play Diablo III and realized, hey, the game's just not that good -- at least not compared to its predecessors. It's certainly not good enough to justify putting up with shifty crap like real-money auction houses and always-online DRM.

Worst: Before Watchmen
Hey, speaking of something that launched with much fanfare and controversy and then didn't end up being particularly remarkable! After all the bluster from Alan Moore, J. Michael Straczynski and other creators and fiery debate from fans Before Watchmen arrived and the comics were...okay. Competent comics from talent who have all done better. Darwyn Cooke's stuff has been good, but it's Darwyn Cooke -- of course it's good. He's one of the few creators with the ability to resist DC Editorial's medicoritizing rays. For the most part though, Before Watchmen has been bland and easily missable, not something that could be said about the original story.

Best: Girls Are Welcome In The Treehouse
This has been coming for a while, and certain subsections of geek culture have been hashing it out for a while, but 2012 was really the year we decided to clean up the clubhouse and invite some ladies over.
Sure there's still some cranks in the clubhouse. There's the "Idiot Nerd Girl" meme and Tony Harris calling cosplayers dumb whores, but unlike in the past the negative memes are being turned on their heads, and opinions like Harris' are being roundly rejected.
Young female creators are getting jobs at the big two publishers, outfits for female comic characters are getting a bit less ridiculous, and hey, when video game developers threaten to rape Lara Croft or try to sell their games with gratuitous fetish nun murder, people actually get upset, as they should, because come on.
Yeah, I know a lot of girls weren't that interested in this geek stuff until it became popular, but that doesn't mean we should cling onto all the most sexist, dumb parts of it to punish them. Give it up. You'll feel better and hey, Friday night anime and Settlers of Catan night might become a little less sausage-ey.

Worst: Spider-Man Didn't Have A Great Year
Spider-Man comics, which had been pretty good for a while, unfortunately webslung their way back to gimmicktown in 2012, culminating in Amazing Spider-Man #700, the "last" issue of the series. Spoilers! -- the issue featured Peter Parker dying (of course), while in Doctor Octopus' body, which Peter was in because Doc Ock was in his body. So Doc Ock is now Spider-Man. Because everyone always loves these storylines where Spider-Man's identity is in question, right?

Best: To Clarify, Spider-Man Comics Weren't Great in 2012. Movies, On The Other Hand...
Could The Amazing Spider-Man have been the best superhero movie of 2012? As much as it hurts my Batman-loving, DC-loyalist soul to say it, I'm coming around to that point of view. Granted I haven't seen Dredd, but Amazing Spider-Man was certainly better than The Avengers, and probably better than Dark Knight Rises too. Yes, it was less ambitious than either of those films, and it's overall plot was very conventional, but it was well acted, with likeable, well-written characters and the action scenes were exciting and didn't just feel like a bunch of CG randomness. Also blonde, bangs-having Emma Stone. Nothing that cute in Dredd I bet. Take that Seitz!

Best: People Kinda Got Interested In Space Again
For years the only response you got from most people when you mentioned space travel was blank stares or spittle flecked rants about MY TAX DOLLARS, but in 2012 the public consciousness seemed to turn a bit of a corner. Remember how everyone was all excited about the Mars Curiosity Rover earlier this year? That was unexpected, wasn't it? Then there was all the coverage of SpaceX's successful launch to the International Space Station. Also, Felix Baumgartner. It seems like people are ready to think space is rad again, which makes somebody like me who's always thought it was rad happy.

Best, Worst...I'm Not Sure? What's It Mean To Be A Geek?
As I said at the beginning, this is the year that geek culture went kind of ridiculously mainstream. As much as I don't care for some of the nasty misogyny behind the "Idiot Nerd Girl" meme, it does raise the question -- when pretty teenage girls, the least marginalized social group possible, want to be part of your subculture, it's really not much of a subculture anymore, is it? What do you do when the guys who used to shout "geek" or "nerd" at you as a pejorative now want to play with your carefully crafted toys? It's a tough pill to swallow sometimes. Let's not pretend it's not.
Maybe it's time to drop the "geek" and "nerd" designations altogether and everyone can just enjoy inarguably awesome stuff like Batman, Game of Thrones and The Walking Dead without labels. Or maybe we can continue to argue about what it means to be a geek for decades to come. That's fun too.
Anyways, that's how I thought geek culture did in 2012. What about you folks? What were your highs and lows? Think I'm the wrongest guy to ever be wrong wrong wrong about Spider-Man or girls being cool or whatever? Let me know in the comments.




“Amazing Spider-Man was certainly better than The Avengers”
*stares at you, unblinking, for a solid 13 minutes of silent puzzlement*
Yeah Im in total disagreement about that one too. Avengers was an amazing feet of filmaking, taking 4 franchise stars and 2 “extras” (Sexy or not they don’t compete with super powers) and making one coherent and extremely entertaining film is way better then what was a middle of the road reboot for the sake of holding onto a franchise film with above average acting ( I liked it but it wasnt great).
For me it comes down to Robert Downey Jr. being so far out of Andrew Garfield’s league that the fact that we just had a Spider-Man origin story is irrelevant.
I thought it’s plot was dumb, the movie was overlong, and villains were generic. Also I’m not a Whedon-banter fan in general. I liked all the Hulk parts though. Take out all Hawkeye and Captain America and Ironman bickering and it was the best Hulk movie so far.
Yeah I’m not sold on the “It’s so amazing, they connected multiple franchises!” Never mind they just did what every fanfic writer on LiveJournal has done since someone decided to mix Twilight and Harry Potter, but all the problems most people feared would come up with mixing so many main characters into one long saturday morning cartoon did arise. Most of all, flat characters with little or no room for character growth. And if you say “They learned to work together”, then congratulations, you’ve defied the aging process and are still 10.
I wasn’t aware LiveJournal made movies.
No, but they write stories where people from different franchises come together…with sexy results! (At least in their minds) And they have about the same amount of characterization.
Did you watch a different Avengers then me because im pretty sure they didnt end up having sex with each other. But i agree there was zero to no character growth, I just liked it better then Spider Man.
Did you see the looks Stark and Banner were throwing each other? And they drove off together at the end? Pretty sure there’s gonna be some iron rage banging there.
I’m pretty sure that old guy was having his way with naked Bruce Banner after Hulk fell out of the airship.
there is no way on the face of this earth that that terrible Spider-Man movie, which treated it’s audience like a pack of feral retards, was even in the same league as Whedon’s Avengers flick.
Yeah, cool story bro.
Regarding non Marvel/DC comics in 2012, as a long time Marvel fan, I had no interest in Image Comics til this year: Planetoid, Prophet, Saga, Happy, and The Manhattan Projects.
Image and Darkhorse have been amazing for the past 2 years or so. The Goon has been and will be one of my favorite comics.
BOOOO Amazing Spider-Man has been great all year. In fact Ends of the Earth was one of my favorite Spider-Man stories ever. If Peter had died in say issue #687 and returned two years later without a reboot of the title (much like Steve Rodgers did) no one would be complaining like this. Well someone would, but not as loudly.
I object! Dredd’s Olivia Thirlby is pretty damn cute.
Completely agree. Not to say Emma Stone wasn’t, but Thirlby is on par and in a MUCH better movie.
“Could The Amazing Spider-Man have been the best superhero movie of 2012?”
No, no it couldn’t.
Well, no, it could have been. But it wasn’t.
You totally nailed one of the worst things in comics, the end of Constantine. Hellblazer needs its own universe it doesn’t really work in the standard DCU and i’ll be sad to see it go. I’ve been re reading Garth Ennis’ run to remind me of all that we are losing.
The only good thing to come out of it is Guillermo del Toro’s upcoming “Dark Universe” movie. The Hellboy movies were good, so Constantine being a part of a good movie is something to welcome.
No…everything that happened to Spider-Man this year was bad, particularly non-comics stuff. “The Amazing Spider-Man”, although not terrible, was still a disappointment, retreading many of the same beats of the original 2002 movie, confusing differences in the story’s details with with a different story.
I mean, come on, both movies feature a scientist at Oscorp working on some project that will usher in the next stage of human evolution who make the rash decision to turn themselves into test subjects to prevent corporate meddling, but is in turn transformed into a green monster who immediately exacts revenge on whoever was doing the meddling in the first place. Meanwhile, it also features a conclusion on top of a building named for the company who owns it named after the person who runs it while the hero has to stop the villain from activating his device at the top of the building that will unleash a blue energy and destroy New York. Definitely didn’t see that one in the Avengers a few weeks earlier.
Meanwhile, the animated series “Ultimate Spider-Man” earned the ire of…pretty much anyone that likes Spider-Man. Not only is it a bad show, but it’s a significant step down from the previous animated attempt at Spider-Man, Greg Weisman’s “Spectacular Spider-Man”. Meanwhile, it also had a hand in the cancellation of the fan-adored “Avengers: Earth’s Mightiest Heroes” in favor of another Avengers series that is in line with “USM”. Jeph Loeb was so frightened to admit this, he lied to the crowd at Comic-Con at told them it was a continuation of “A:EMH”, a statement which since then has proved terribly false.
Yeah, Disney is screwing up left and right. “Tron: Uprising” has been hopping around the schedule because they’re terrified somebody might watch it and realize it’s amazing.
Jeph Loeb basically didn’t want to admit his whole “dump the overarching plotlines” thing killed EMH.
I’m pretty much resigned to the fact that all Spider-Man movies are going to involve scientists, Spider-Man fighting on tall things and bad guys who wear green, because well, that’s kind of what Spider-Man is about. At least Amazing Spider-Man was a good version of it.
@Dan Tron: Uprising is fantastic. I was bored to tears by the movie, but I’ve been incredibly impressed with the animated series.
@Nate I’m not going to get all up in arms because we have a difference of opinion, but yeah it’s been a pretty shitty year for Spider Man. I didn’t really think the movie was bad, but it just wasn’t… good. My problem with them doing the origin story again, is that there was absolutely no reason to. It’s not like the only people familiar with it these days are comic book fans. The original trilogy was a massive worldwide hit. Anybody who was conceivably going to go watch Spider Man already knows how he got his powers, and there was no reason to spend like 30-45 minutes going over it again.
@Nate Oh also, you should definitely watch Dredd as soon as you have the opportunity. A great example of how you make an ultraviolent B action movie.
To add on to the Worst: Watchmen, I didn’t even know that the comics came out, so….
Also, it totally looks like Dr. Manhattan is givin’ it to the Silk Spectre hard in that picture. Which, while totally reasonable, made me giggle.
I really like happy and some of the stuff valiant is putting out
I try to be non-partisan in the comments, but to say the least your comments on asm comic/movie pissed me off. Firstly, don’t be such a whiny fanboy about the ending (for now, probably as we all know) of asm 700. You said this was a bad year forr the comic, NOT IN THE LEAST. Just because the ending was bad doesn’t overshadow that Dan Slott is a phenominal, no, the perfect writer for spiderman’s adventures, and even if you don’t like the end everything leading up to it was a great ride.
As for the movie, fuck that movie, fuck it so much. I have never seen a better example of corporate greed in films. The movie exists solely so sony can retain the spiderman liscence because money. It’s simply a grab bad of good director, good writer, good actor that they threw together for profit. There’s no soul, no heart, it’s a disgusting husk of a film that’s more concerned about making Peter Parker a cool, skateboard ridin’ bing usin’ suave superhero than making anything remotely respectful or celebratory of asm’s long history. The Amazing Spiderman movie isn’t a celebration of Spider-man, it’s an abused beaten cash grabbing mule that’s forced into doing it’s tricks that everyone loves so we can give Sony Pictures our money.
My point is, Dan Slott LOVES Amazing Spider-Man, and he has only worked hard to give readers the adventure and fun that the series has brought us for so long, Slott is the reason we don’t groan about early 2000′s spiderman comics because he brought us out of it. “Brand New Day” and “Big Time” are two of the most memorable marvel comic arcs in YEARS, and you’re willing to throw that all out the window because you didn’t like the ending? Slott was given the ‘Marvel NOW!’ ultimatum to end spider-man and you know what? He did it, and he did it in a way where, when you think about it, could have been SO MUCH WORSE. So don’t be mad that it’s over, be happy because it existed and that Slott is still writing which only means more ‘amazing’ adventures.
It’s not about the outcome, it’s about the heart, and when I have to choose between some pretty good actors and director who had a little fun making a movie because they were told to, and a man who almost single-handedly brought asm out of a serious slump, saving asm from being canceled with a whimper, and gave us a four-year-MOTHER-F*CKING-BANG instead of excellent issues that celebrated every front of Spider-man’s existence and made me remember why we all loved reading about the cockiest, funniest, and most amazing super-heroic wall crawler again, I don’t have to even hesitate.
With great power comes great responsibility, and Slott gave Spider-man a viking’s funeral.
I like Dan Slott. He’s a good writer. Sometimes good writers write something that’s not so good. It’s okay. I’m sure he’s a swell guy and will write many good things again.
Oh, and you do know every superhero movie ever made was made “because money”, right? That’s also why they publish comic books.
Well of course, but looking at a movie like Avengers, Joss likes comics, he cared enough about comics to totally grab the entire project by the balls and do it his way, for example. It just bothered me to no end that sony prevented a spiderman involvement in the avenger’s film universe because money rather than the greater cinematic good. But hey, daredevil’s fair game now, apparently, which may be worse actually because of how great spider-man and daredevil work together.
And about the comic, I’m just saying it’s a stretch to say it was a bad year for spider-man when it was, in my opinion, another phenomenal year for Slott with a mediocre ending which was less his decision and more him attempting to work around an executive decision.Kinda like a bad movie with a good director, it’s forced to have a bad ending, but he did it in the best way he new how and in at the very least a fun story, aftermath aside. Like, what if we just had more “One More Day” stories? I’m just hating that everyone on the internet is so up in arms over the ending, rather than celebrating what a great four years it has been.
This round has to go to DisposableFry > Nate
From what I know, Dan clearly LOVES the character and was able to create an artists vision of the universe. On the other hand, Sony’s movie was fun at points.
If you watch Raimi’s Spiderman and Webb’s Spiderman, Webb’s is clearly the better film. If you think otherwise I’d love to hear why, not including the “unnecessary” argument which is just redundant. Yes, they had to make a film to retain the rights. They didn’t have to make a good one, but they did. Setting it at the beginning of Parker’s story effectively distances itself from the original trilogy and adds the foundation for a successful and quality series. I’d rather have a fresh start, get to know this version of Spiderman, Gwen, and MJ, and then move into some new storylines than just accept Raimi’s atrocious series as the standard for Spiderman. This one was better than those ones. I’ll agree that I think it’s a better realized universe than the Avengers was, and I’d say it’s a better film. Of course, it doesn’t help for me that I find Downey Jr.’s shtick to be increasingly grating.
As for Slott, I tried to get back into Spiderman several times during his run, and couldn’t do it. It’s no longer an interesting title for me. Doesn’t mean it’s necessarily bad, just a little bland for me personally.
This has been the first year that I look forward to Image releases far more than Marvel or DC ones, I’ve always loved Image books, but now I give every number 1 a try and genuinely get way more excited for Image heavy weeks. I’d say it’s been a fantastic year for geek culture in terms of exposure and having cool things get made, but I think there’s plenty of room for the next generation to bring in a new level of quality and talent. Source material should be adhered to a little closer in films to come, and hopefully we’ll see more ambitious projects emerge.
Saga, to me, is what Avatar could and should have been if Cameron had some balls and had stayed away from children level colonial tropes.
why did they needed to reboot it? marvel comics doesn´t reboot spiderman every time they change artists. make a spiderman movie, with different actors and just tell a good story. Vince at filmdrunk said once, you don´t need to see john mclain at the police academy in the first movie to understand his a cop. We all know who spiderman is and what his powers are, now make a good movie.
Moron troll is trolling moronicly.
spiderman is better then dark knight rises annnnd avengers? ok…
As a 40 year old former geek/nerd/dork/whatever seeing how mainstream the nerd image has become is confusing and amusing. It’s a natural course of events though. I can see that now that I’m older and could give a damn about what an 18 year old wants to wear or do. Most “counterculture” trends eventually get sucked up and made popular to “the masses.” I use quotations because these things aren’t really counterculture. It’s the nature of things. I remember how pissed off my 20 year old self was in 1991-92 when punk rock shows went from small events in intimate clubs to huge festivals where it seemed that every frat boy and cool kid who ridiculed you in high school was now “totally into the mosh pit maaaan!” I was mad because they took MY thing. That thing that made me different. What I didn;t acknowledge is that I was just different like all the millions of different people just like me. We all wore the sam clothes and listened to the same music.
However, it’s one thing for a really cute teenage girl to actually gravitate toward comic books and video games instead of the Kardashians and Jersey Shore. It’s another thing to take the perceived look as strictly a fashion choice.
The worst thing about this is that it can water down whatever it is that you are really into. Disney buying Marvel and the rights to Star Wars SHOULD make people cringe.
Image put out some amazing comics this year….
The thing about Teenage pretty girls being geeks: this is happening since before my time, Nathan. There were always pretty girls that liked comics, games, rock, sci-fi, skating or bikes. We were the ones that felt unimpressed about Barbie’s dolls and would not wear pink anything till late twenties (or never).
The unnerving of the situation is that some girls decided to make it a thing, to try to profit from it somehow just like some guys do, wearing ridiculous glasses or clothes. They are not genuine but they will pass. It’s a trend and it will pass.
Pretty girls have the same right to enjoy a comic book or are they doomed to be boxed in what people think that’s ok concerning pretty girls? The fact that people gets so amazed that an attractive girl can really get a kick in playing a game or even get crazy about D&D or adore zombie stuff is infuriating. I imagine that a lot of nice looking girls like all of what is labeled as “Nerd Stuff” and like it in private to avoid that kind of reaction. Girls that grew up close to their brothers, cousins or fathers, who used to skate with them or play videogame until they got to the phase when was not normal to a girl to continue like those things and not fall into a stereotype. And the only reason I’m telling this is because I know a lot of boys really believe in this idea that the pretty nerd girl is a new thing, almost like a sweet X-rated dream. Have a little faith, boys: there are pretty real smart girls that love the stuff as much as you do.
The skateboard “discovering his powers” in the abandoned warehouse scene in Spiderman was one of the most Poochy the Dog things I’ve ever seen. Sure, Garfield + Stone > Maguire + Dunst but that doesn’t make up for a villain who’s evil plan still doesn’t make any sense to me. Temporary lizards for everybody!!! And did anyone actually like the turning of the cranes scene either? He can barely climb, but he still has enough energy to fight the Lizard five minutes later? Maybe come up with a less blatant way to showcase 3D. Avengers was so much more entertaining.
You immediately win my favor whenever you make a good poochie the dog reference. Yet to come, Andrew Garfield is an alien and must return to his home planet, he also uses bing.
LOl Soon as I got to the “Amazingly Shitty Spider-Man was better than Avengers” part I realized Nathan Bitch was either a total moron or a total moron trolling the fans. Either way, article done and Nathan forever written off as an author.
“Also blonde, bangs-having Emma Stone. Nothing that cute in Dredd I bet.”
Was that a joke that flew right over my head? Because Dredd also had blond Olivia Thirlby.
And yeah, I think Dredd is my favourite comic book movie adaptation of 2012.
Amazing Spider-Man was ebtter than the Avengers? Funniest shit I’ve read on the internet all week.
er, better*
Super late to the party, but I agree with everyone in the comments: Amazing Spider-Man wasn’t just bad. It was awful. There’s a reason why popular opinion keeps turning on it, well those that still remember it even exists. Seriously, it wasn’t a movie, movies are memorable. It was vapor.
The ingredients for a better movie than the original were there, but it was dull, lifeless, poorly-constructed with a despicable human being as our hero instead of, you know, “your friendly neighborhood Spider-Man.”
Avengers/Dredd > Dark Knight Rises > my dog’s dump > Ghost Rider 2 > Amazing Spidey