
There were a lot of great books this week: Great Pacific had its fourth, twisty issue and we’ll have an interview with Joe Harris about the book later today; the first issue of Snapshot sets up what looks to be something a lot more complicated (and troubling) than its initial premise would indicate; Green Arrow #17 gives that book a fresh start. All of these are highly recommended.
Red Team is the best this week, though, because it does something we never thought it would do: Namely, restore some faith in Garth Ennis.
Ennis has written several classic books: Preacher, Hitman, and his work on the Max version of The Punisher all spring to mind.
But with a lot of his more recent work, Ennis has trended towards self-parody. In Preacher, the gore and gross situations worked in the context of the book, especially since there was a larger point to it. In books like, say, Ninjettes or The Boys, the sex and violence tended to be for its own sake, or for shock value, and it just got tiresome. When you can peg everything that you’ll find in a book not because of the concept or the plot, but because of the name on the cover, that’s a problem.
Red Team, however, is defined by its restraint. The book itself is serious: The plot follows four police officers who’ve finally had enough of a local criminal mastermind, and go to the other side of the law, murdering him in cold blood. There’s no people obsessed with fetish porn, no weirdly scarred horrors, no exploding heads. There’s not even any gore, really.
Instead it’s a look at how just, righteous people can, ever so subtly, and then not so subtly, lose their way. The fundamental point of the book is that laws don’t exist to be inconvenient, and it actually ties in with Ennis’ favorite subject: Namely, that people who think they get to decide what’s right are vastly more dangerous than criminals who know they’re monsters.
Craig Cermak’s art is solid, but he’s mostly being asked to keep it restrained; the book is very script-focused and heavy on the dialogue, but Cermak does get to play with layout in a few places. One hopes Ennis will give Cermak some room to show off later in the series. Adriano Lucas actually does a good, subtle job with the coloring, bringing out texture in Cermak’s art.

Overall, it’s a noir story with a lot of potential, from a writer we’d thought had lost the concept of restraint. If you like crime stories or hard-edged noir, check it out.




YES!
still haven’t read this issue yet but I’m looking forward to it. I can understand where you’re coming from with the Ennis critiques, but for the overwhelming majority I think his work is brilliant. some of his “schtick” is immature and tiring at times, but where else can you see Judas Iscariot getting beaten to death with a dildo in an adult shop while a talking bunny looks on (Chronicles Of Wormwood), a super-hero sex orgy (The Boys), or a man getting a scar on the top of his head to make him look like a giant penis (Preacher)?
moreso than that however, I feel that his pacing and storytelling capabilities are just awesome. The Crossed Vol 1 book is probably one of my top 3 favorite graphic novels of all time. The way that story opens, slowly reveals, and keeps pulling back in focus is just really, really cool. I love me some Ennis.
He’s a talented writer, absolutely. It’s just sometimes I want him to dial it back a bit. And he did that here.
Fearless Defenders #1 was interesting. Focusing purely on Misty Knight and Valkyrie, I like that they didn’t just assemble a team (Like they did with every team in the Avengers Initiative), but rather are having the team form an issue at a time.
As I’m typing this I realize why I liked this. It didn’t feal like a team book, it felt like the old Marvel Team-Up series from the 70s. Spiderman would investigate something and run into Dr. Druid, and then next issue would continue the story with Dr. Strange assisting. In this case it’s Misty & Valkyrie (Both of whom appeared in the old MT-Us) and next issue we get a new element.
As for the story, it revolves around an ancient viking relic and its ability to raise the dead. Misty is doing some relic recovery and Valkyrie would obviously be interested in undead vikings.
I’m not saying it’ll be great, just that it has potential.
The other thing I read last night was the All-New Xmen #5, which still leaves me curious as to how they’ll play this out without utterly crushing the continuity. These 5 characters have no learned way more about their future than you could reasonably have them simply “ignore” when/if they return to their time. It almost has to end in a mind-wipe/reset of them or something.
I agree, it has a nice team-up feel. I’m really behind, though, as I had no idea Valkyrie was a lesbian.
I had no idea either. I haven’t seen a comic in years that featured her; she’s usually in the background of someone else’s comic.
I think with The Boys Ennis just set out to have fun skewering the tropes of the superhero genre and the oft- vapid mindset of the publishers. I don’t think he meant for it to be taken all that seriously, and I think it worked like gangbusters. The whole Herogasm arc was incredibly over-the-top with the sex and violence, but that was the point. It was a metaphor for inane crossovers. I think the fact that Butcher, MM, and Hughie ended up being so well-fleshed-out was just a happy accident of Ennis’ talent. You can accuse the satire of maybe being a bit on-the-nose, but I mean, it’s satire. The gratuitous sex and violence worked in that context. If anything I was more let down by the last couple volumes in Preacher than I was by The Boys.
I liked the overall idea, but honestly, it was a question of character growth. Ennis enjoys making superheroes dicks, and he’s got a valid point: Incredibly powerful people with no supervision become monsters, sooner or later. But there was just no balance or complexity to it outside the main cast.
Here we’ve got more complexity, I think.
I’m a sucker for all things Ennis, so maybe I wasn’t looking at The Boys as critically as I should’ve. I still enjoyed the hell out of it. I’m looking forward to this getting collected, too. Sounds like it won’t let me down.
Hey, if you liked it, you liked it. That’s the key thing, here. I’d rather people buy comics they like.
Anyone else reading Thuderbolts? I’m not sure why but it’s running out of steam, to me. It might be the illogic of putting together a team and then telling them nothing about what’s going on. The fact that the team members have noticed this at least means the author is acknolwedging it. But I’m about an issue away from giving up on it; there’s plenty of other stuff out there.
I am. It is running low on gas, a little bit, but I’m in the “give it until the end of the arc” boat.
I thought Fury Max was enjoyable and fairly restrained, its pretty recent.
I’ll give it a shot!
The fairly restrained bit being where Nick Fury runs through like eighteen Asian call girls in a night? I thought it was kind of a lesser “Punisher Max.” All the gore, without the (admittedly slight) grounding of Castle.
I think Punisher Max is one of the angriest comics ever written, and it’s one of the few times Ennis has really gotten political. And it works, too. I’m surprised he hasn’t followed that since.