
As you may have heard, the backlash against Girls — the new HBO show about four Brooklyn girls with trust funds — has officially kicked off.
Of the criticisms that have directed at the show, and there have been many, one that’s been repeated a few times is how painfully white it is — the show, at least in the pilot, was completely devoid of substantial non-white characters. The only person of color to make an appearance in the show was an comically jolly homeless black man in the final scene. There was also an Asian girl who got like 5 seconds of screentime to say how she was good at Photoshop.
Perhaps if the show were set in rural Nebraska, there would be less made of its lack of color. But it’s set in Brooklyn — one of the more ethnically diverse places in the world, and some are finding it unacceptable that the show appears to be little more than a Brooklyn hipster version of Sex and the City.
In a post for the Hairpin, New York Times tech writer Jenna Wortham, who is bi-racial, writes:
But I definitely did not expect these kinds of girls. They looked like the kinds of girls in college who would push their hands into my freshly teased party hair – without asking – to ask me if my curls were real and whose already overstretched smiles would wobble a little bit when I showed up at the party with my roommates before cautiously asking if I went to school there.
My chief beef is not simply that the girls in Girls are white. I’m a white girl and not a white girl, identified by other people as black and not black for as long as I can remember – which, in mixed people speak means biracial. But the problem with Girls is that while the show reaches — and succeeds, in many ways — to show female characters that are not caricatures, it feels alienating, a party of four engineered to appeal to a very specific subset of the television viewing audience, when the show has the potential to be so much bigger than that.
…
These girls on Girls are like us, they are like me and they are like you, they are beautiful, they are ballsy, they are trying to figure it out. They have their entire lives ahead of them and I can’t wait to see what happens next. I just wish I saw a little more of myself on screen, right alongside them.
So with all that venom floating around out there, Girls staff writer Lesley Arfin decided to respond with the tweet in the lead image: “What really bothered me most about Precious was that there was no representation of ME.” She has since deleted the smart-ass tweet.
When will people learn that silence is the ultimate power move?



I’m struggling with the inherently complex nature of my biraciality so I’m going to take it out on a relatively benign half hour sitcom on HBO…
What J. Wortham wrote was complimentary, appropriate, and thought out. What L. Arfin wrote was petty and stupid. If that’s one of the head writers, that explains the heads-up-their-asses tone I kept getting when I saw the pilot. She comes off every bit as immature and sheltered as the characters on the show.
Also, TCB, I feel like I keep writing first/only comments on your articles. I don’t know why this is. I swear I’m not stalking you. In unrelated news, I’ve noticed (via the Left-B camera I put in your shower) that you keep missing that spot on your back between your shoulder blades when you loofah it up.
That spot has always been a problem for me. Just reach out and wipe it down for me every now and then. I won’t cry or anything.
REALLY not helping your case, lady.
I’m not defending the show (which I haven’t seen), but I know it takes place in Greenpoint and Williamsburg. I live in Greenpoint, and there really aren’t many black people living or hanging out around here. And I almost never see black people when I’m in Williamsburg. Brooklyn may be ethnically diverse, these two neighborhoods are not.
Damn shame she deleted that tweet, or I would have favorited it too. If you’re going to hate on Girls, don’t do it because the show doesn’t address bi-raciality. That’s not the show’s job. Hate Girls because it’s a terrible show full of nauseating characters and banal dialogue.
That just so happens to be why I canceled the “record entire series” commend on my DVR for it.
I didn’t watch The Wire because I could identify with the characters. I watched because it was about interesting characters and compelling story lines.
Criticism without perspective is better suited for toilet paper..
I’m going to assume this show is made by a bunch of people who went to art school to become ARTEEESTS. Because it seems very artsy for the sake of being artsy and because, like most are students, the characters are all overly self aware to the point that they are unaware of anything outside of themselves. Also, Precious is about a girl that nobody can relate to so they all essentially ignore her so this lady picked a real bad example.
What part of Brooklyn is this show based? Cuz here in Bensonhurst (southern Brooklyn) it’s mostly Chinese now.
The tweet was stupid but so is the “I couldn’t identify with anyone because they don’t look like me” argument. Always had been. I thought we left that as a viable complaint back in the 20th century. If something’s good, it’s good. If something sucks, it sucks.
Agreed. People just look for racism everywhere these days. To be fair, Wortham didn’t sound like she was all that upset about it; maybe just mildly disappointed. Although it does seem to be the thesis of her article, so… bit of a waste of time, I guess.
I don’t really see any problem, in terms of realism, with four white girls descended from wealthy families not having any black friends in their inner circle. Wasn’t the same true of Sex and the City? I don’t think non-inclusion of black characters in a show or film is any crime at all, unless it’s like… white actors playing characters who -should- be black, like if the movie’s set in Kenya or something and you’ve got Benedict Cumberbatch playing Kitenge and William Shatner playing Muntu. It would be nice if every show gave work to a white actor, a black actor, an Asian actor, a latino actor, an Indian actor, a native American actor, a middle-eastern actor, a Maori actor, and as many other races as there are… oh, and an openly gay actor, too… but that’s not gonna happen, and I don’t think it’s really worthwhile to decry that fact in an article devoted entirely to that point.
Also, why does anyone care if they can “see themselves” in a show? Isn’t that a kind of egotism? I guess I wouldn’t really understand the value of that in terms of race, though. I’m sure I’ve enjoyed some shows that have few or no central white characters in them — Chappelle’s Show, The Boondocks — but I suppose the racial exclusion thing is really only an issue for minorities. Still, race notwithstanding, I don’t see many characters like myself in tv shows or movies, but I still manage to enjoy a lot of them.
I should’ve included handicapped people in that list. They’re not a race, but I’m sure they would appreciate being represented in any/every show, and there are a lot of them around, especially in big cities. Mentally handicapped, quadriplegic, blind, deaf, developmentally disabled, etc…
At a certain point, the cast is gonna get kind of ridiculously big if everyone insists on being able to see their own particular group in every show.
JJ, that’s a lot of text so I’d be lying if I said I read all of it, but I agree. “I didn’t see myself” just shouldn’t even be a talking point. It’s useless and self-involved. If racial diversity isn’t a reality in a certain setting people should have to force pacify everyone. That would make this show even less watchable.
I appreciate your candor, Maske, and I’m glad we agree.
Maybe an easy solution is to cast every person on earth in every show.
Finally got around to seeing it. My encapsulated review: Meh.
There wasn’t a single girl that you wanted to root for. What Entourage was for d-bags, this is for put-upon hipster girls–a decidedly smaller audience, though slightly more sympathetic (if you aren’t a d-bag).
Because pilot episodes don’t always jell, I’ve got the second one set to record. I’m hoping that, well… they actually do something.