
As we all know, Google Fiber is currently stringing up cables in Kansas City, and Kansas City is happily enjoying connections one hundred times faster than the average American gets. Needless to say, Time Warner and AT&T are very sad that somebody is competing with them — not to mention blowing their service out of the water — since this is something that they’ve never had to face before.
So, are they competing by lifting data caps, perhaps, or spending some of their sweet political ad money or profits on upgrading their systems to demonstrate to their customers why their service is still a value? HAHAHAHA. Um, no.
What, you expect them to compete in the free market? No, instead they’re whining that Kansas City should give them the same tax breaks that it granted Google.
Quoth the Wall Street Journal:
Now, Time Warner Cable Inc. and AT&T Inc., the incumbent Internet and TV providers in town, are angling to get the same deal.
Among the sweeteners granted Google by both cities are free office space and free power for Google’s equipment, according to the agreement on file with the cities. The company also gets the use of all the cities’ “assets and infrastructure”
Time Warner and AT&T are arguing that it’s only fair that they get the same assets. Because cable is at this enormous disadvantage otherwise. Just to review, these are two companies who paid, out of their own pockets, to wire this area and in return, get a virtually exclusive monopoly in the area that has lasted for decades.
So, really, if we want to talk about “fair”, maybe you should let other companies compete against you in your markets? You know, the way it’s supposed to work?



Only new customers get the nice perks. Folks who’ve been subscribed for ten years get the shaft.
Ha! As if that’d help them. Writings on the wall, guys: you are fucked in Kansas City.
Devil’s advocate, they’re not wrong to bitch about the city granting incentives to only Google.
HOWEVER!!!!!!!!!!!
These two fucking companies, as you mentioned, could have done this years ago. Obviously there is demand for a superior broadband service in Kansas City (and everywhere else). Rather than happily sit their asses on outdated infrastructure perhaps they should have been more proactive in upgrading their service. By providing the supply of high performance broadband themselves there would be no demand for government subsidies to Google for their network. You don’t get to choose when free market principles are applied, clowns.
I dunno, I think they are wrong. I mean, I assume these were special incentives granted to Google to encourage them to bring their amazing new service to Kansas City instead of another city. Just like my stupid town is about to take $50-100 million of taxpayer money to build a new stadium in hopes of attracting a AAA baseball team, even though we’ve already got a (formerly AA) baseball team in town. Wouldn’t be reasonable for the existing team to ask for a bond to build a new stadium, because just like AT&T and Time-Warner, they’re not offering the same product that the new team/company would/does. Not that I give a shit about the difference between AAA and any other kind of non-major-league baseball, but the difference between existing cable internet and Google Fiber is so insanely huge that they’re only technically the same service.