
Ads are a necessary evil on Facebook. But you can help make them less annoying, with a few tactics worked out by Lifehacker.
Lifehacker sat down and analyzed everything that Facebook does to make you pesky, and, well, there’s quite a lot of it. As they point out, Facebook’s relentless plugging to your friends of stuff you “like” is what screws up your feed, even if you set it to “most recent.”
We’re not talking about your own status updates, photos, or anything you post to Facebook yourself—just the way you interact with other pages, groups, and people on Facebook. It’s one thing if your news feed is full of baby pictures from your old high school friends—it’s another thing when every post you like from a group you follow ends up in all of your friends’ news feeds without you knowing or being able to control who sees it.
The entire post gets into the nitty-gritty of what Facebook does and why. You might have seen this in action earlier in the month, when reviews of a banana slicer on Amazon just seemingly would not die in your Feed. That’s because Amazon was paying to promote those posts.
So, how do you stop it?
The short answer is limit your Likes to stuff you genuinely enjoy, and avoid products where possible. They also recommend starting a Like Profile, basically a Facebook where you have no friends and all you do is Like stuff, thus getting the deals and coupons and updates that would otherwise not be yours.
Either way, if we all do this, it’ll make Facebook less annoying, and Facebook earnings calls far more entertaining. And both are noble goals.



If someone likes Oreo cookies and I’m on a diet, I should be able to dismiss that ad and let them replace it with something else. It’s not in a company’s best interest to annoy the crap out of you. If I don’t want to visit match.com you really can’t make me, and reminding me constantly will only entrench me against such an action. The answer to all this is just to give you some small control over what you want to see.
For a year I got suggestions to like Mitt Romney, which I attributed to one reverently republican friend. So it might have just been paid for, eh? That’s the only reason I can think of for not letting you click a “no way in hell” button and banish it back to the land of wind and ghosts.
It was indeed just paid for. I got the same ads, and I wouldn’t have voted for Mitt Romney if he’d written me a $100,000 check.
I read that as “wind and goats” and imagined a much smellier realm where the scent of backalley abortions turn into feeding frenzies.
Goats love hangers.
@Dan: But would you have taken the check?
…Yeah, probably.