
So far, “Pan Am’s” biggest contribution to the TV landscape has been providing hacky writers with an excuse to use airplane metaphors while discussing the show’s ratings. After debuting with a solid 10.8 million viewers, the ratings have gone into a nosedive, and the show’s in danger of being grounded, thus canceling future flights. But ABC isn’t going to let the show crash on autopilot; it’s hired “Lost” producer Steven Maeda to get “Pan Am” out of its tailspin before it crashes into the World Trade Center and sparks a decade-long war on terror that includes a poorly executed and unnecessary invasion and occupation of Iraq. Okay, maybe that last one is a little bit of a stretch.
Maeda, whose credits include Lie to Me and Lost, will serve as showrunner and EP, joining creator and EP Jack Orman and director/executive producer Tommy Schlamme behind the scenes of the Christina Ricci drama about the mysterious lives of the airline’s pilots and stewardess. ABC has yet to make a decision on whether or not the pricey drama will receive a back-nine order…
Behind the scenes, the studio and network are making an extra push of late in promoting the series, which has continued to shed viewership. [THR]
Part of the reason ABC doesn’t want to drop the series is because it spent an extravagant $10 million to get it made, and according to one source I have on the show (I have sources!), a lot of that cost comes from filming in New York instead of Los Angeles. Apparently, it can get costly to make Brooklyn streets look like markets in Rangoon (or wherever), when it would be way cheaper to use a set on a Hollywood lot. TV executives are crazy smart.



Looks like Pan Am has hit some turbulence.
Isn’t hiring a guy whose previous show featured multiple plane crashes kind of a bad idea?
So…we had a war with Iraq because of Pan Am?
I just don’t know. I mean, bringing in Madea just to get some of the Tyler Perry audience feels like desperate stunt casting to me.
More like Pam Ain’t, amirite?
My wife watches this show (mainly because it is on after Desperate Housewives), and from what I’ve caught of it, calling it “execrable” would be an insult to the shit I took this morning.
Uh, oh wait, I had something good for this…
No SonofSpam, we’ll have a war in Iran because of Pan Am.
Problem solver: A time warp opens up and sucks in our cast…they arrive in 2006 and go to work for…PAN AM, in its waning, knockoff last gasp days. Money saved!
Pam Ain’t? More like Pam Not Watching This Shit.
… that was a bit of a stretch, wasn’t it?
Needs more Eartha Kitt.
Have they considered doing a Black Snake Moan meets Snakes on a Plane “Very Special” episode?
@ MattK
It’ll come up organically.
I’m trying to imagine how much coke Ricci has done since the Addams Family to make her look THAT jaded.
That last one isn’t a stretch.
It is exactly what happened.
The wife and I watch this. Cause we’ll watch pretty much anything for 5 episodes. None the less, if it were on HBO/Showtime/Etc and could really get sexual and raunchy, it’d be softcore porn. It’d be OK then.
It does give me an opportunity to make Casper the Friendly Ghost jokes when Ricci is on screen, so there’s that.
A TV show about an airline that was an utter failure thanks to over extravagance, indulgence, and changes in American culture is now a failure? Gee, I wonder why.
Matt admitting the invasion of Iraq was poorly executed and unnecessary? Colour me impressed.