
Former “SNL” cast member Rachel Dratch has a memoir out, Girl Walks Into a Bar …, which means she’s doing the publicity circuit, which means there’s been a lot of talk about why her career stalled after she was booted from “30 Rock” in favor of Jane Krakowski. Dratch offers her own assessement:
I am offered solely the parts that I like to refer to as The Unf—ables. In reality, if you saw me walking down the street, you wouldn’t point at me and recoil and throw up and hide behind a shrub. But by Hollywood standards, I’m a troll, ogre, woodland creature, or manly lesbian. … Trolls, ogres, and woodland creatures can be done with CGI, so that leaves yours truly to play the bull dykes.
Jezebel, naturally, is outraged, arguing that there’s a double standard in Hollywood with regard to ugly people.
Dudes like Tim Allen, Bernie Mac, Drew Carey, Jerry Seinfeld, Steve Harvey and Kevin James all went from being stand-up comedians to having their very own sitcoms, despite not being typical heartthrobby leading man types. So where is Rachel Dratch’s Garry Shandling/Larry David-esque TV show?
Is that true? Yes, certainly to an extent. Less attractive women do have a more difficult time landing juicy roles in television and film, but it’s not unheard of. Kate Micucci — who is not traditionally attractive — has managed a decent career in Garfunkel and Oates, and lengthy stints on sitcoms like “Raising Hope” and “Scrubs,” while Kristen Schaal (“30 Rock,” “The Daily Show,” “Flight of the Conchords”) has managed the same. Lena Dunham, likewise, is suddenly the voice of a generation, thanks to her new show “Girls,” which debuted on HBO last night (and it is fantastic, and populated with awesome ladies, some of whom might qualify under Dratch’s “Unf___ables” category).
I don’t disagree with assessment, however. But I do think that Rachel Dratch is not a ideal poster girl for the argument. She was never that great in “SNL,” where her most popular character, Debbie Downer, was one note and that note wasn’t very funny. I’ve also seen “Spring Breakdown,” which Dratch may argue was shelved and eventually released straight-to-DVD because of Hollywood’s bias against the less attractive, but the reality is, Spring Breakdown — even with Amy Poehler and Parker Posey — was a dreadful, horrible movie.
I appreciate where Dratch is coming from, but Jezebel’s argument that she belongs in the same category as Larry David, Gary Shandling, or Jerry Seinfeld is ridiculous. Yes, they are not attractive men, but they are also very, very funny. Dratch, on her best day, is barely tolerable. Allow me, moreover, to present one very convincing argument against the inability of “Unf___ables” to land meaty roles:

(Via Slate)



Melissa McCarthy also comes to mind.
Melissa McCarthy is doable, plus-sized be damned!
Am I the only one that thinks Kate Micucci is hot? Maybe my love of G&O slants my opinion, but I think shes hot.
She is cute in a quirky kind of way.
I would agree completely.
I didn’t know Kate Micucci wasn’t “supposed” to be attractive. Most of those other women seem to fall under the “quirky attractive” umbrella.
I’d like her better if she had a chin.
She’s fucking adorable. Not in a traditional sort of way, true, but I’d still say her looks are an asset for her, rather than a liability. Pretty sure I heard her say the same when Riki Lindhome interviewed her on her podcast.
I’d definitely kick he rout of bed after we had sex
Waitwaitwaitwaitwaitwaitwaitwaitwait…you’re telling me you WOULDN’T f*ck Bea Arthur?
She was a goddamn Marine in WWII, I bet she could teach us all a trick or three.
Why does Bea Arthur have this look on her face that says “I fuck mean.” in every picture?
That Hunger Games girl has a touch of the Bea Arthur. None of these not traditionally attractive girls had better age.
I wouldn’t fuck Bea Arthur with Bea Arthur’s dick.
Did Jezebel forget that Ellen Degeneres had her own show? Jezebel is the worst.
You now have an article decrying your sexism towards Jezebel on Jezebel.
There is? I can’t find a goddamn thing on that site, they should have let a man handle the GUI design.
That site is notoriously thin skinned. Fucking everything in the world is trying to kill female happiness according to Jezebel. I mean, it assumes that I’m trying to get all my girlfriends to wear french maid outfits and do anal…I am but like, give me the benefit of the doubt.
This might be a *tad* off topic, but am I the only one who started to find Ellen hot AFTER she came out? And not in a…picturing her mugging down on another chick…hot, either. (although that would be pretty hot to see) I’m just saying…she seemed so, self assured after she came out. Just did it for me.
There’s also that chick from Glee, Jane Lynch. She’s not exactly attractive at all but she has her own show and probably will as long as she wants one. I’d also say that Alyson Hannigan isn’t exactly a knockout but she’s material for a female lead on a sitcom.
yet that horrible goblin Kristen Schaal keeps getting work
“Goblin” is a funny word.
Also Jezebel must have forgotten Rosanne also had her own show. Again, Jezebel is the worst.
Beat me to it.
Both, actually.
Also, I know lots of us have a crush on Tina Fey, its mostly because she’s quirky, funny, and smart. If she wasn’t the funniest woman on TV, she wouldn’t be a star based on her looks.
What’s wrong with Tim Allen?
He’s really an example of the opposite of what Jezebel is talking about.
If Jezebel wants to take away TV shows from Tim Allen, Drew Carey, Bernie Mac, and Kevin James I am OKAY with that. The stupid cunts that write for that site forget that there’s idiots that watch this shit and there’s something inherently funny about a fat guy, especially in a little coat.
I only bring this up here because you mentioned it, but having watched Girls last night because of the hype it got I can honestly say it was awful.
I’m sure Hollywood is thinking “I know we might be throwing away tons of money, but I’ll be damned if someone as ugly as Rachel Dratch has a career!”
Carol Burnett?
Two women in a bar are trying to say something funny. Woman A is more attractive but says something less funny. Woman B is less attractive but says something funnier. Which woman is going to get more laughs from nearby men?
I think most men would agree with me; it’s Woman A. Sorry, ladies. We’re cavemen.
My point being that Rachel Dratch won’t get her own show because she’s not funny enough to overcome her looks. Whereas women like Sarah Silverman and Whitney Cummings are good-looking enough to overcome their inability to be funny.
Zack, I’ll give you the Whitney comment, but Sarah Silverman is pretty funny.
But Sarah Silverman and Whitney Cummings talk just like guys!!! Get it? IT’S HILARIOUS!
Silverman’s not unattractive. If she wasn’t somewhat funny I probably wouldn’t be able to handle the voice, but otherwise I give her a solid 7.5.
I’m surprised Jezebel didn’t add Louis C.K. to that list. He’s not a good looking guy, but he happens to be very funny. Jezebel is still the worst.
Hey, I’ll have you know Micucci aka “The Gooch” owns my heart
The Gooch…well played. We can’t see her in anything else since Psych.
Pretty sure I’m thinking of someone else….move along people….nothing to see here.
Maybe she should’ve adopted a stage name that doesn’t sound like slang for vomit.
Oh and Girls is terrible. We get it, awkward comedy. However, awkward doesn’t mean intelligent or even funny,
Three words: Sarah Jessica Parker.
Look, I would marry Kristen Schaal. She looks like she knows her way around a panini maker!
Military offensives will be launched against this blog if you call ‘Girls’ fantastic one more time.
Isn’t that every article on Jezebel? They have a point, but then they take it so far and to such extremes that they ruin it.
Jezebel is the Punisher of feminists blogs.
The fact that I made that joke means I have no woman in my life.
What about unfunny attractive men that get their own sitcoms? Looking at you Ashton Kutcher.
If she rails against the system she may as well go outside it. Do something like Portlandia or maybe an online serial. Anyone who insists they’re that funny as a lead needs to prove it before anyone will sink the big bucks.
pretty sure rachel dratch’s dick is bigger than kristin schaal’s
Just being reminded of Debbie Downer is causing me to feel down
Ugh. The fact that the Jezebel article refers to the Debbi Downer character as “legendary” (a legendary piece of CRAP, maybe, amirite?) negates any validity to their opinion. I WANT MY PAGE VIEW BACK.
Married women who watch sitcoms like to laugh at the funny schlub of a man because they remind them of their husbands. Married men have no such filter, and want the girl to be hot regardless of the show. Once again, we’re pigs, but the ladies knew that already. You don’t often see guys who look like Seinfeld being cast in shows like Castle, Bones, Grey’s Anatomy, etc.
Solid work finding the one picture where she doesn’t look a bad Wallace and Gromit character
I bet he found it on google by searching “Extreme Photoshop Rachel Dratch”
Is there any way we can blame this all on Chelsea Handler?
Yeah, you would never find unf*ckable chicks on TV. Except in Ellen, Rosanne, The Rosie O’Donnell Show, The Golden Girls, Mike and Molly, Sex and the City, Raising Hope…..Hmmm. Also, Rachel Dratch was never that funny.
Well said. Although, for what it’s worth, I find Martha Plimpton and Kristen Davis somewhat attractive.
I think The Unfuckables has the potential to be a pretty good HBO show.
“In a world where fuckable women enjoy getting cocked on the regular,You wouldn’t throw your cock in these women on your worst day. They are*swoosh sound, word graphic* The Unfuckables”
An HBO show with ugly women/no boning.
Um….no.
The already made it. It’s called Girls.
Well, you said you wanted gritty. In other word… ugly. I wanted Mary Ann on “Gilligan’s Island” ugly, not Cornelius on “The Planet if Apes” ugly. TV ugly, not… ugly ugly.
Hey, you went too far! Rachel has been called ugly, pug ugly, fugly, pug fugly…..but never ugly ugly!
She used to be Kid Gorgeous. Then she was Kid Presentable. Then Kid Gruesome. Then finally Kid Rachel Dratch.
Every woman listed on this page is fuckable besides Rachel Dratch.
Pretty sure Bea Arthur would break MY hip…
Would you fuck Kate Micucci? I would.
Would you fuck Ratchel Dratch? I would not.
Lessons learned? Absolutely.
This is less about looks than it is about Rachel Dratch’s talent. As in, she hasn’t got much. Also I couldn’t make it through this post without puddin’ it to Bea Arthur’s pic.
Is about who you’d bang or who you’d RATHER bang?
Rachel Dratch not having a job, whatever. “Girls” being called fantastic is a seriously wrongheaded and near-criminal act.
She’d probably get more work if she were better-looking. She’d also probably get more work if she were funnier. It’s unfortunate that her looks have held her back, but that isn’t the one and only criterion in play here. And as others here have pointed out, there are definitely women uglier than Rachel Dratch who’ve had great success in television.
has the original 30 Rock pilot ever seen daylight? I have always been curious.
I would like to see that. I’ve always assumed that in addition to being far less attractive than Jane Krakowski, Dratch was dropped because they realized she couldn’t do more than sketch comedy – look at her appearances in the first season: they’re all skit characters, and it’s jarring seeing that in an episodic tv show. Not that everyone on that show are actually great actors, but they’re more than just over-the-top caricatures.
Well…She’s got big cans. So she’s got that going for her, which is good.