
“The Pitch,” the new AMC reality show about the world of advertising, is fascinating less for what it is than what it represents. Unlike the show that it follows, “Mad Men,” or the scores of other fictional programs about adverting agencies, “The Pitch” is a real glimpse inside the inner workings of a client pitch, and it is decidedly unglamorous. The process itself is surprisingly dull, and where “The Pitch” succeeds, even unintentionally, is in the way it reveals the advertising profession for exactly what it is: Complete and total bullsh*t.
In a way, “The Pitch” does for advertising what stepping inside an actual courtroom can do for the legal profession. The first time I worked a case in a courtroom, I was surprised to find that most of the lawyers in the room were stammering, inarticulate, slovenly people that wore ill-fitting suits. It was nothing like the legal dramas we see on television. There are rarely eloquent closing arguments or challenging cross examinations; it’s mostly dudes shuffling papers and asking tedious questions. (Also, courtroom acoustics are terrible.)
Likewise, what we learn in “The Pitch” is that the advertising profession mostly entails normal-looking, middle-aged people sitting around desks and shooting the sh*t. It requires an unimaginably large number of employees blathering back and forth to come up with something as simple as a tagline for a potato chip. It looks a lot like what I imagine “consultants” do, which is to say: Not a whole hell of a lot. Yet, both consultants and ad execs are paid obscene amounts of money to come up with relatively banal ideas that you might imagine most of us could come up with in half an hour over a lunch. These agencies are teeming with idea people who sit around a table and talk, writing their thoughts on blackboards, and waiting for inspiration to arrive. They will literally spend hours talking about the importance of a certain word that tests well, like “premium.” (It reminds me a lot of this George Carlin bit.) There’s never an epiphanic moment. In fact, in many cases, the agencies seem to resignedly end up with a campaign not because it’s great, but because it’s the best thing they can come up with within the time constraints.
The show itself has nice production values, and it’s structured so as to eke out the maximum amount of drama. The gist of it is this: Two ad agencies compete over a client. The most interesting parts — really, the only parts worth watching — are the first ten minutes and the last ten minutes. In the beginning, we are introduced to the client who lets each agency know what it wants (often keying in on certain words, phrases, or messages that they want highlighted, or color schemes important to them), then the members of each agency go back to their offices to talk it over for the next week. At the end of the show, they meet with the clients again and give their inarticulate spiels using slideshow presentations and poster boards. The producers attempt to wrest as much drama out of the pitch as possible, but reality of any workplace is rarely that compelling.
Typically, the show likes to focus much of its attention on whoever it is that will be giving the presentation, and the producers will take pains to create drama out of what’s typically no more than a bad case of the jitters. The presentations themselves tend to be somewhat interesting, but only in the dumbstruck sense that it took seven days, 50 people, and an around the clock effort to come up with these simple campaigns, although I will admit that they are more impressive once they’ve been executed (they will often air the winner’s finished ad at the end of the show).
I don’t want to sound like I’m being too hard on the advertising profession — it looks like a fun job that allows for the occasional, isolated bursts of creativity, and it is certainly a lucrative one. It just looks like they make a lot of something out of nothing, which I suppose is the point of advertising. In that respect, “The Pitch” is quite a success. More than that, we needed a reality show about advertising because, as George Carlin once noted, the packaging, distribution, and marketing of bullsh*t is America’s leading industry.



Well, it looks like somebody’s been drinking cranberry juice all week…
a – f grade? now!
If anyone here is in marketing or advertising, kill yourself.
[www.youtube.com]
My brother-in-law saw some of my work in market, told me it sucked (which – to be fair – it kinda did), then sent me that.
My response:
[www.youtube.com]
Is there a profession that isn’t more interesting on TV? CHiPS > handing out speeding tickets all day
As someone who works in the industry, your assessment is spot on. I’m in a relatively small, boutique agency that makes a shit ton of money because the creative process among big agencies is so watered down and inefficient that there is money to be made through little more than speed (which translates to cheap) and charisma (although the fact that we have some damn good Creative Directors help too).
It doesn’t help that most of the “decision makers” (ie brand people) are nothing but bean counters who care more about what appeals to a focus group of 20, unemployed, cat ladies rather than their own common sense. In that vein, I wouldn’t be too quick to judge the agencies based on the final product, although sadly in a lot of instances it’s totally valid. In a recent project we had, we promised 20 designs to a major beverage manufacturer for a special promotion, and threw in a few extra (which were eliminated in our internal meetings) at the request of a senior designer. One of those rejects – and probably the WORST among them – was chosen by the client to go to final execution.
I think The Pitch does a good job in highlighting that more often than not it’s a matter of logistics and pandering rather than pure creative.
I’ve worked in advertising for about 5 years. I haven’t watched the show yet, mostly because these people look like a bunch of hacks, or maybe that’s just compared to the actually attractive, smooth-talking people on Mad Men. In either case, your review sounds spot on – except for the “well-paid” and “lucrative” parts. It takes a shitload of people to make ads happen, and everyone is underpaid. In an agency of 300 people, there are maybe 10 who are making good money.
“I was surprised to find that most of the lawyers in the room were stammering, inarticulate, slovenly people that wore ill-fitting suits.”
I hadn’t realized we’d worked together before. Next time I’ll buy you a drink
The Pitch is an accurate portrayal of agencies in the same way that The Bachelor is an accurate portrayal of dating. Every industry has a share of self-aggrandizing blowhards, and surprise, they are the first ones to jump at the opportunity to be on TV.
Only the shittiest agencies would make their clients and employees suffer through the banal pedantry displayed weekly in this show.
mmmm… well written review and i can understand your attitude based on what you see… but what you don’t see is that in most agencies with any credibility the creative process often requires huge amounts of effort to make the end result look simple. If you look through any cannes award books you’ll see heaps of adverts that look really simple, and you will feel you could have come up with that. That’s the hardest part, coming up with simplicity. A good ad has to be original, offer unique perspective, change your perception in some way and be so simple you get it in a few seconds. That’s why you think they’re easy…… however if all you’ve ever seen is what’s on the pitch then I forgive you. Most of the ideas are poor but the time constraints are tight. Check out some of these and then get back to me [www.welovead.com]