
The first major shake-up in late night since Jay Leno’s return to The Tonight Show was announced yesterday: Jimmy Kimmel Live is moving from midnight to 11:35, going head-to-head with Letterman’s Late Show and Leno. It’s a smart decision in every respect for ABC, and a huge boon for Kimmel, who has quietly become one of the most popular and well-liked talk show hosts in the field. Here are five reasons why it was a wise decision on ABC’s part.
1) He Gets a Head Start on the New Generation at 11:35 — Letterman is 64 and Leno is 62. They’re on their way out. Letterman has a contract with CBS for two more years, and Leno is expected to sign on for another couple of years, as well. That’s likely it for both hosts. Leno has stepped away once, and is expected to make room for Jimmy Fallon soon, and Letterman can’t go on forever (who will replace him is still up in the air, but I like the odds for Conan, who replaced Letterman on Late Night, and having him replace Dave again, and compete against The Tonight Show would be a cool full-circle move). Kimmel can move into the slot and begin to get entrenched before the other new hosts come along.
2) Because Dave and Leno Are Old — Kimmel is 20 years younger that his two competitors in that slot, and it shows. Leno and Letterman have been doing the same schtick for decades, and Kimmel — with his viral videos, his upcoming Emmy hosting gig, and his high-profile slot hosting the White House Correspondent’s dinner — is the far more buzzy late-night host at the moment. His ratings are also up over 14 percent since last year, and ultimately Kimmel will likely be able to attract a younger, more advertiser-friendly demo than Dave and Leno.
3) Because It Keeps Kimmel on ABC — Kimmel’s contract was coming to an end, and this move ensures he stays with the network. Would he have moved? Probably not, but the last thing the late-night wars need is another spurned, unappreciated talk-show host. After all, we’re only a few years removed from ABC’s attempt to land Leno and bump Kimmel to a later time-slot. This move demonstrates that ABC appreciates Kimmel, erases any hurt feelings, and removes any threat of him leaving.

4) Because It Makes the Most Financial Sense — No doubt, this is the real motivating reason behind the move. According to the LA Times, Nightline generates $40 million a year in revenue; Kimmel generates $100 million (compared to $159 million for Leno and $154 million for Letterman). The move will allow ABC to charge higher rates than Nightline (which has been moved to 12:35 a.m.). Kimmel doesn’t even have to win the ratings war with Leno and Dave; he only needs to close the revenue gap to be considered a success.
5) Because He’s the Second Best Talk-Show Host Right Now — Tim Goodman over at THR called Kimmel the new King of Late Night and claims that he “is the best late-night host on television.” Personally, I’d still give the nod to Jimmy Fallon and his refreshingly post-ironic approach to late night. However, I agree that Kimmel is creatively leaps and bounds ahead of Letterman, Leno, and even Conan. He’s got Carson’s affability; he’s a great, likable interviewer; and while he doesn’t try as many new things as Fallon, his brand of edginess is more in tune with the 11:30 hour. Plus, he doesn’t have any of the baggage the other hosts have — Leno’s unfavorable ratings are high because of what he did to Conan; Conan is still seen as bitter over his ousting; and the affairs that Letterman had with staffers has turned him off with some people. There’s nothing particularly divisive about Kimmel. Indeed, he can do more than peel off viewers from The Late Show and The Tonight Show: He can bring new viewers to late night.



I like it because it’s a fuck you to the piece of shit Nightline’s been since ABC canned Ted Koppel.
So did Craig Ferguson murder your parents in front of you or did he just have sex with your puppy?
This
Also this.
agreed.
Fallon’s getting better, but he still needs to work on the actual “Q&A” part of hosting a late show. Sometimes he comes off like such a fanboy it’s unwatchable
Craig Ferguson > all these guys.
STILL THE BEST.
Agreed. I have watched him since I was a six year old in 1990, and while his show has lost some of the edginess, I’ll watch his show ’til the day he retires. Then I will decide which new late-night host to watch.
The Late Show has been terrible for a long, long time.
You got any gum?
I don’t have time for another late-night show after The Daily Show and Colbert Report. All of these guys are lost on me. I love Conan but I don’t remember the last time I watched his show from beginning to end.
seconded.
yuuuuup. I watched Conan every night until I mistakenly decided to graduate from college and took a “career”. Horrible, horrible decision on my part.
Agreed.
I do love me some Craigyferg. Hell… Geoff the Robot has more talent than Leno.
LOVE GEOFF!
I love the comments right now. I was about to scroll on down here and bitch about no Craig Ferguson but these mufuggas get me man.
maybe the Nightline ratings are really good even though the advertising rates don’t equal entertainment?
In which case the ratings don’t matter. It’s all about the revenue.
I didn’t think it was great move by ABC, then I read this article and quietly nodded my head at your first four points… then you said the two best hosts are Fallon and Kimmel and you totally lost me. But still, point #5 doesn’t invalidate the first four points.
By the way, am I the only one who thinks you shouldn’t count out Colbert in this network late night musical chairs? Letterman’s contract goes til end of ’14. Ferguson’s contract goes til end of ’14. Colbert’s contract? End of ’14. (Which was curious because Stewart’s contract ends in mid-’15.) Take that as you will.
I hope Colbert doesn’t go late night. I enjoy his schtick as a hardcore convservative hidden liberal on C.C. I don’t know if the masses would understand his bit.
Craig Ferguson is by far my favorite host right now, but I don’t think his show work at 11:30.
Does anyone else enjoy the monologues where Craig analyzes the work of a philosopher, artist or historical figure? I think they’re the most awesomely subversive things on late-night TV but he seems to give up on them or get discouraged when the studio audience doesn’t react well.
Yarr, I don’t think his show *would* work at 11:30.
Not his fault the show tapes at 5:30 or so and gets the same crowd as Leno.
“Kimmel is creatively leaps and bounds ahead of Letterman”
Except for the fact that every late night host from Kimmel to Conan to Fallon owe their entire careers to Dave’s show.
To “Late Nite”, yes. “Late Show” hasn’t exactly been groundbreaking, but Late Nite with DL is probably the best of it’s kind of all time. The monkey-cam, the wall of velcro, stupid human tricks… all stuff that may have more hip/modern peers, but that was insanely creative at the time.
My all-time favorite Late Night with David Letterman bit was the following. On Mondays, Late Night was a repeat. One Monday, without announcing it, Letterman dubbed an entire episode into Spanish. Second best Monday bit was when Letterman was at home watching his own show and flipped around on himself.
Being a long-time listener to the Kevin & Bean show, way back when he was “Jimmy the sports guy”, I was stunned he ever wound up on a network, let alone anchoring a late show. But I applaud both that and their foresight in moving him up.
Now pointing to him and saying he’s on par with Letterman and Leno is no longer lip service. He’s officially a peer.
Craig Ferguson has it in his contract that if anything happens to Dave, he gets the Late Show. Craig has to get the Late Show when Dave retires. There’s no way Dave would choose someone else to take the job because it would be like choosing Leno to replace Carson.
My only fear with Fergy taking over for Letterman is that they tell him to tone down his perviness. That won’t fly with me. I’d rather him follow another guy who replaces David.
Jimmy Fallon? ew.
its not a great move… because its Jimmy Kimmell…..
I think late night TV with the whole monologue, goofy stunt/bit then interview celebs format will steadily lose viewers and may be replaced by something similar, just with a different format. Or maybe things will get shaken up once Leno and Dave retire and new hosts come in, but you saw how well that worked with Conan (even though he didn’t have much of a chance to gain viewers when he lost the Leno loyalists from day 1)
Jimmy Fallon is S-H-I-T. The Roots rock.
Finally.
[www.youtube.com]
David Letterman and the Angry Monkey Tea Party.
Yeah, I know there are posts about Craig Ferguson, but I’ll go ahead and make my own rant. The fact that you didn’t even mention him practically discredits your opinion. I’d say he’s the best followed by Kimmel. I do agree on the timeslot though, not sure if Ferguson would work earlier, but I think he deserves to be the heir of Letterman.
Another Craig Ferguson loyalist here. His week of shows in Paris was the best thing I’ve ever seen in late night.
My two cents on the current late night shows: Conan is very congenial, but he has never been as funny as he was in the late 90′s early 2000′s when he did shit like devote the whole front half of his show to the fact that NBC was airing this episode at 2am due to the NBA finals (a segment we like to call “No One’s Watching”)
Letterman and Leno are both tired hacks.
I find Fallon’s interviews the most awkward thing ever. He has a lot of energy, but I think he would be better suited to hosting a 70′s style variety show than something where he has to awkwardly laugh his way through interviews.
John Stewart is the best interviewer in late night, possibly in television.
Colbert is the most innovative late night now on TV.
PS somehow forgot to mention: Craig has the most heart and seems the most genuine, his going back into the studio to re-record his opening for the show after the Auroa, Illinois shootings was incredibly class, Colbert and Stewart are more consistently funny, but he definately is the best traditional talk show host.
Kimmel peaked on “Win Ben’s Stein’s Money.” I would argue his show is just as tired as letterman and leno 90 percent of the time.
Fallon really the best? i mean get it he’s the yougest and he has the fresh ideas and the cool bands and stuff, but that in any way makes him the best, far from it. And yes anyone who follows Craig Ferguson on regular basis would agreed that he’s far the best host of late night. Simply because it dosen´t matter the bits o the guests he has on the show, people watch because the guy is funny, natural, and subversive, more than any other.