
Reed Hastings, the CEO of Netflix, is out making the press rounds this week, and much of what he’s doing is defending his decision to release all the episodes of his original programming simultaneously. It’s an exciting idea, and one that may very well work.
But I also find it annoying, and the things I find annoying about it may be cause for concern, if others share my same annoyances. Take, for instance, the fact that 13 one-hour episodes of the David Fincher directed, Kevin Spacey series House of Cards are being released on Friday.
Look, I am incredibly excited for this show, and I’m really anxious to see it. But, it’s Super Bowl weekend. I have to watch a couple of movies for my job, I gotta spend time at the Apple store getting gadgets fixed, I gotta take the kids various places, and run a bunch of tedious errands that’s part of being a goddamn adult. When am I going to find time to watch 13 hours of House of Cards this weekend, and if I can’t, am I going to feel left behind so many other people have already seen it, and if I feel that way, am I still going to be excited about it come next week when The Walking Dead returns, or when there’s another episode of Justified and The Americans to watch?
Look: There are three kinds of television viewers. There are those who watch television the same day (or at least the week) that something comes out, and those are generally the people I run across on the Internet. They want to be first. They want to be “tastemakers” (I hate that word). Then there are those who don’t give a rat’s ass, as long as there are good shows to watch. They will binge watch when they get a few hours. Mostly, they keep up with television on Netflix, and watch everything a year after it aired on television. Those are the people I know in real life. Then there is the third group, the people who don’t watch television at all, and those people I just can’t abide by.

It seems to me that it’s that first group of people — the tastemakers — that make or break a show. We discover it, we tell our friends, and a year later, they’re all watching it on Netflix. But what if those people are discouraged by the 13 hour runtime? Most of the readers here fall into this first category: You guys wouldn’t be reading a television site if you didn’t watch a lot of television. How many of you plan to watch House of Cards on Super Bowl weekend? How many episodes do you plan to watch? Are you going to be annoyed if the guy in the cubicle next to you is telling you that he saw the whole damn series and wants to tell you all about it?
Reed Hastings argues that this is what television viewers really want. He compares a television series to a novel: We wouldn’t want to read a chapter and wait a week before we could read the next, would we? Well, look what’s happened to the publishing industry. Is that really something that Hastings wants to emulate?
I liken it more to the opening weekend of a movie. A movie gets nearly 50 percent of its audience on opening weekend, and come the Monday after, most of us have moved on to the next thing. If we don’t get to House of Cards by Monday, are we going to move on to the next thing? It takes a lot of promotion to launch a television show, but once that promotion has died down, will Netflix be able to grab new viewers? If no one is talking about House of Cards on Tuesday, will there be word-of-mouth to promote it?
That’s the other thing: Television viewing in this day and age is a communal experience. Something like 50 percent of people are multi-screeners, meaning they have their television blaring on one screen, and their laptops or IPads on another screen. They tweet about what they’re watching. They post to Facebook. They show up the next day on sites like Warming Glow and The AV Club to talk about it. The Netflix strategy takes that away from us. Unless we can all collectively agree to watch 13 hours of House of Cards at the same time, we’re going to lose the communal experience that makes shows like Justified, The Walking Dead and Breaking Bad so much fun to watch.
My final point is this: I get anxious if I fall behind on a television show, and I don’t think I’m unique in this respect, even among people who don’t write about television for a living. On Sunday nights, I will often stay up to 2 or 3 a.m. to catch all the shows I’m meant to watch. Meanwhile, TV Guide had an article out yesterday that said that just 11 years ago, there were 35 scripted programs on television. Now there are 143, and it’s growing. That’s a lot of television, and I can only watch so much in a given week. How am I going to squeeze in 13 hours of House of Cards, to boot? I need a certain amount of societal pressure, or at least backlog on my DVR staring at me, to push me gorging on a television show. A couple of weeks ago, I was out and missing the American Horror Story finale. Everyone talked it the next day, and because that conversation has passed me by, I haven’t bothered to get around to it two weeks later.
I would love nothing more than to spend my entire Saturday watching the show, but that’s just not practical for most of us. And if there’s not a huge first wave of people to stoke the fires for a show like House of Cards, to create thousands of little conversation all over the Internet, will it — and it’s $100 million budget — burn away? Or will we all come to it gradually, and at our own pace?
I don’t know. I guess we’ll find out over the next few weeks.



will these netflix shows be released on dvd in the future?
That’s my big question. I know many of their movies have been in the past, but I worry since they are new to this part of it all. My gut says they have to at some point, that’s a lot of revenue. This will be a prime issue once the verdict is in on the “Arrested Development” episodes.
DVDs will eventually join their video tape predecessor in the Natural History Museum of Mainstream Storage Media. But, don’t fret, the “stream”, alone, offers so much more. C’mon in. The data’s fine!
i just want to pick up house of cards and arrested development on dvd. i have no interest in paying 9.99 a month for something i wont use often. i’d buy both if reed put the shows out on dvd.
OH NOOOO! Are you saying we might have to watch television shows at out leisure, instead of having to adhere to the scheduling of a TV network? So instead of getting 2 or 3 month hiatuses like we had to sit through for Walking Dead, Revolution, Grimm, and pretty much everything else on NBC, we can go right to the next episode? That just sounds terrrribbbbllleee.
Privilege is a terrible gift. “But, it’s Super Bowl weekend. I have to watch a couple of movies for my job, I gotta spend time at the Apple store getting gadgets fixed, I gotta take the kids various places, and run a bunch of tedious errands that’s part of being a goddamn adult”
^^^ That. That SO much. Being a Goddamn adult is so hard, you guys.
This will be better than “Boss”
Should be a good test run for Arrested Development I don’t have a problem with i…see how spoilers will work I guess
Spoilers are definitely a bigger concern in this kind of release model.
Agreed. It’s hard enough to avoid spoilers as it is, that’s my only real issue with the all-at-once dealio.
But I really wonder if they gave the release date itself much thought. Super Bowl weekend doesn’t seem like a very smart strategy to me. Seems like more cons than pros to that one. But I’ll definitely be watching it, and probably sooner rather than later.
Cover your ears and scream,, “I don’t like spoilers!” at the guy in the next cubicle. It is the perfect way to make sure he he never talks to you again.
From our side, spoilers are going to be annoying. From their side, I could theoretically subsrcibe to Netflix for a month only to watch everything in a quick period then cancel it. I guess they are making the assumption that most people won’t do that out of laziness, and/or they’ll get hooked on the other content.
Hey man. I’ll watch those movies for you if you come to Austin and handle all this boring-ass lawyer shit.
I think Netflix knows darn well that viewers really interested in a Kevin Spacey political show could give a rat’s ass about a football game.
yup, I’m more excited about House of Cards being released this weekend than I am about the superbowl or anything coming to theaters. Sure, for Spacey and Fincher but the reason is more that I’m excited that this is happening finally – original programming on netflix released in a manner that up to now was reserved for previously aired shows. But what do I know, I’m not a “tastemaker”.
Not entirely true.
I’m very interested in House of Cards.
That being said, there is no way I miss the Super Bowl to watch it.
Disagree. And if Netflix is thinking like that, they are definitely underestimating the amount of crossover audience for football and a show like this. While it may be a surprise to non-sports fans, not all football fans are knuckle dragging idiots who only watch shows like “Dog the Bounty Hunter”.
excited for this as it looks fantastic. however, i am binge watching west wing at the moment on netflix and its gonna be a lot of politics to balance.
I’m stuck in West Wing binge mode, too. I ran thru all of season 1 over the weekend and was rewarded with Ainsley Hayes.
Ainsley didn’t make her debut until the 2nd season. After one of the main characters had been “Mandy-ed”
I started Season 2 Monday night and S2:E4 introduces Ainsley Hayes (and Ted McGinley), who I’d forgotten about because of the decline of Callie Duquesne.
I had an “Oh yeah I remember when she was… holy shit she used to be hot” moment. That was my reward.
i’m in season two now and ainsley is quite awesome.
i love how the show uses every random actor possible: mcginley, john larroquette, corbin “roger dorn” bernesen, etc.
I am also not a fan of the all episode release either, but i’m sure they’re trying to not come off as trying to be so “network-y”. I’m going to try and impose self discipline and watch one or two episodes a week. Here’s to failing miserably!
Is the entire series just those 13 episodes, or is there a possibility of a second season?
I understand why Netflix is doing this, as part of the appeal of TV series already on Netflix is that you can binge watch them, but I agree that not being able to watch it at the same pace as other people on sites like this could lessen my enjoyment of the show.
Netflix ordered 26 episodes (2 x 13 episode season). Production on season 2 starts in a month.
This is how Netflix separates itself from cable. It isn’t just another channel, one that you have to buy separately. It is an on demand service. You can watch what you want, when you want. It is no only looking to get people hooked on the series, but to get used to having tv when they want it. If they released one episode a week, what is the difference between a Netflix series and any other network series that ends up on Hulu?
There’s joy in anticipation and this is like having all your presents on december 1st.
@xlarti
There are two different experiences here: enjoying getting new stuff and enjoying the stuff. The first is relative, the second isn’t.
There’s also something to be said for self-control. If you want to anticipate it, watch one episode per week for the next 13 weeks. Spoilers an issue? I guess you have to deal with it somehow. I don’t see this as a bad thing.
@xlarti
Really? Joy in anticipation? So you’ve been enjoying this wait to find out what happens on Walking Dead? I’m gonna assume you don’t watch Doctor Who or Sherlock, cause if you did, you would know that waiting for Moffat to get around to finishing up storylines and seasons is downright agonizing. Seriously, who finds joy in waiting for a television show?
…so watch it at your own pace, like you would any show on netflix that you’re newly starting, as I am with Battlestar Galactica. I watch shows on tv and netflix and pace wha I want. You don’t have to watch the whole series this weekend or this whole month. It’s a good model that works with their current tv lineup. Just because you can’t do a stupid weekly recap doesn’t make it a bad model.
*pace how I want.
Good ol iPad keyboard,
His point is that the discussion of a show is almost as much fun as the show itself and that this model all but kills that. “So just watch it” does not really add anything to the conversation here.
Well yes it does, because you can still discuss the thing and watch at your own pace. Just man up and say you didn’t have 13 hours free to blast through the show. Say what episode are you on? Like we do with every other show on netflix. It’s not rocket science.
Ok so the model is bad for warming glow. I guess I’m not really worried about that. The model fits Netflix perfectly, which is why dumping it all at once makes sense. The whole point of netflix is to watch what you want when you want. WG could overcome this by having a weekly discussion of an episode each Friday and if we wanted to follow their model we could watch one once a week to join in, or just talk about that specific episode if we’ve modest it. Or we could continue having recaps of other shows every week and WG will still operate just fine,
I can easily see Warming Glow or AV Club or some other site that bands around communal watching of a series simply lay down the ground rules for discussion.
For example:
“This week we are watching Episodes 1-3 of House of Cards. All discussion must be related to the events of these 3 episodes only. Should one feel the need to watch more, that’s fine but please do not spoil it for everyone else. Next week we’ll watch Episodes 4-6 and discussion is then opened up to include anything that has happened up through Episode 6.”
So, I don’t think this model is a deal-breaker for internet analysis and discussion. Does it make it more difficult? Yes, of course, but that does not make it impossible.
It is a similar thing like with what AV Club does with their classic series reviews. Many people have seen through the series in its entirety, but the reviews tackle the classic series as new and the comments deal with the episode at hand. The only difference is that there usually isn’t a “No Spoiler” policy in place.
I hate waiting. I hopped on board the Justified bandwagon late, but now that I’m caught up it’s frustrating having to wait a week between episodes.
Exactly, I was late to Breaking Bad but caught up in time for the last 2 seasons and now I feel like I need to rewatch the entire series before the final episodes start. Which I’m excited about, but wouldn’t have been as necessary if I’d powered through it all, plus this wait for the end is a killer.
“Well, look what’s happened to the publishing industry. Is that really something that Hastings wants to emulate?”
Dude, genius rhetoric there. “Hey, books come with all their chapters at one time and publishing sales are down.” The structure of a novel is not what’s responsible for the publishing industry falling on tough times.
Holy fucking hell. Just watch when you can.. Noone reads WarmingGlow anymore anyway.
If it didn’t already exist, this post would justify the creation of #firstworldproblems. It seems to me that your problem with this is the timing of the release, rather than the format. And that may be a rather valid concern, “debuting” a series the same weekend as the Super Bowl in this format seems dumb, especially when waiting one week would fill a gaping entertainment void that will come about with the end of football.
But complaining about the format of the debut – all episodes at once – is whiny and hypocritical. This is EXACTLY the type of approach to a television season that this very website has advocated on behalf of for quite some time now. Now it’s a bad idea because it doesn’t work exactly the way you’d like and is somewhat inconvenient? Jebus H. Christ, could you be more self-involved?
That’s why you shouldn’t have children or own any apple products, too much maintenance.
This is a real pickle you’ve found yourself in. We will all pray for you in such trying times.
These complaints sound like the old folks who were afraid of changing music from tapes and CD’s to mp3 players. If Netflix is changing the way TV viewing is done then maybe try and adapt and come up with a new creative way to discuss/review those specific shows. Find a fan forum or something that has discussions for each episode (i’ve seen this already for plenty of shows) separately so you can discuss at your leisure just like you watch at your leisure.
The times are changing so why not change with them? Adapt and evolve. If TV viewing never changed we wouldn’t have DVR’s or Premium Cable Networks. This is the future of doing things….stick with the times.
Has anyone thought about the gap between seasons… if more are to come? Not sure this is applicable here but for other show it may be an issue if you need that “fix” that other shows like Breaking Bad as an example create.
I think a happy medium would be be three episodes a week and then the stand alone final. That’s enough to satisfy someone who hates waiting and allows the viewer to digest what they just saw without feeling overwhelmed.
Thank you…
[images2.wikia.nocookie.net]
But to be honest this just seems like trolling.
I think Dustin is vastly overestimating the amount of people that are going to watch all 13 hours of this thing in one weekend.
That’ll probably happen for Arrested Development just because of hype and excitement and the fact that they’re only 30 minutes each.
But for new shows like this? most of them i’d think many folks will just go through it at their own leisure. Yeah it may make online discussion a little tough, but if it works and takes off then internet discussion will adjust.
Dustin, although this format is a little different, since nobody has a head start, WG currently has at least 2 running commentaries (GoT and TWD) where people are specifically asked not to discuss spoilers in the “first” thread. and I think everybody does a good job of being considerate of others, so I don’t think it will be problem.
Maybe have a post up midweek for people that may have plowed through the whole 13 hours already? Not that you have to much more than ask the people what they thought?
Go nuts, make a post where there are 13 different links so if someone has seen up through episode 4 they can jump to the episode discussion and everyone in that thread will be on the same page?
While I agree that this might not be the best weekend for us football fans to start something new, you guys at WG have advocated people getting Netflix and powering through past seasons of a show to get caught up with the cool kids.
Spoilers shouldn’t hinder the effect of a good show. You cite “American Horror Story” being spoiled and killing your interest, but could it be more a case of what was spoiled being sub-par? I was underwhelmed myself and I watched the damn show religiously.
My point though is that while spoilers suck, the show shouldn’t suffer if it is well done. Would you skip over an episode of “Game Of Thrones” because something was spoiled?
Just my opinion of course and there are plenty of exceptions to this belief. But I just have a hard time hindering my enjoyment on a spoiler, especially due to the fact that it is so easy to be spoiled today.
There are people who bitch about the “Movie going experience”. You know the types: You have to see it on the big screen with the mega sound in a room filled with people, as a shared experience. (Forgetting the cell phone talkers and popcorn eaters)
I feel the same way about this. There’s a shared sense of focus on something when you all get it in installments. Having a chance to digest each and every part is part of why some things are so damn popular. Arrested Developmen especially is something where it’s great to take a pause (of a week) and discuss things that you may have missed.
The only plus is that when you get them all at once and binge-view it lends itself to viewing again because of any subtleties or sight gags you missed in your hurry to speed through it.
The issue here is some people like it one way and others don’t to have to be a time and place every Wednesday so they can tell Lois at water cooler they saw last nights episode, or make sure their DVR is set and able to hold episodes they didn’t catch. Some people like to watch things at their own pace. Netflix is trying to give you that option.
I’ll get to this show when I get to it. I kind of like that it’s all out there at once. I can see where the apprehension comes from, though.
I dunno. I’m not too excited about House of Cards. I’ll watch it. But being able to watch the new Arrested Development at my own leisure (i.e. all night booze-fueled marathon followed by a “wait…what happened?” next day screening) sounds like a wonderful thing.
WON’T ANYONE THINK OF THE TV RECAPPERS?
Perhaps the current administration should appoint a programming czar who possesses the sole authority to determine release dates for all new television productions. I see a fight looming between audiences who prefer instant access and audiences who would otherwise choose to “spread the programming around.” We’ll, I don’t need someone else telling me what viewing schedule is or is not appropriate for my TV. So long as programming is ready for immediate distribution, I should be able to do with my flat screen as I see fit. I choose not to be a citizen of this emerging nanny TV state. No doubt, the post-production rights of television viewership throghout the free world will be adjudicated in a landmark decision entitled “Go vs. Wait”. In the meantime, take your hands of my remote and get out of my living room.
….Or, Dustin, we could discuss something worthwhile. Like, how much mainstream TV programming is generally garbage, yet it’s eaten up by the masses.
This whole article is just you whining about….not even a First World Problem. It’s worse than *that*.
Christ.
If you have anxiety to spare over not having watched enough TV*, then you are a very lucky person.
*Particularly a TV show which is a remake of a miniseries from 1990, for pete’s sake.
Pretty sure all of us excited for House Of Cards give little or no shit about a football game on Sunday. As for watching 143 hours of TV every week, 80% of everything is crap so it’s not really that much to watch
Unless you are the post production team working on a Netflix full season release show, you shouldn’t have many complaints. Just think of a world without having to watch another promo of “next time/previously on.” And you won’t have to punch your fists together after weekly or midseason cliffhangers. You can stride or marathon through a show however your viewing style allows. I’m sure there will still be plenty of conversation around the water cooler if the show is any good.
This all-at-once programming will sort of change how TV writers plot their episodes, no? Now the big cliffhangers that happen on Breaking Bad et all will be less effective because Netflix will automatically play the next episode right away.
I don’t remember which contributer, but on this site like 6 months ago had a post about how cable and TV are a dying format, and the digital releases via Netflix, Hulu, and Amazon Prime are the future. Paying for what you wanna watch and watch it at your pace. But despite that, the site now is clamoring for weekly episodic programming, and for Netflix to conform to an old format. If other shows would do this on a digital site, we could have monthly programming where we watch full seasons, and may in fact give shows like Community a shot because they’re not relying on advertising but subscriptions. Honestly I couldn’t care less if it hinders recaps and shit Iike that. I don’t need a 3 page post about an episode I just watched, plus I don’t watch tv shows live often as it is. My DVR is backed up because I watch shows on my schedule both on tv and Netflix. This site works well as a TV news/entertainment blog and forum.
Not that anyone ever looks at old comments/threads, but damn, just saw the first episode of House of Cards and Jesus H. Christ it is so much better than “Amerika” it isn’t even funny. It was ridiculously good.
So I just finished the first 3 episodes and all I have to say about it is this:
I totally understand the concerns. Having a show released weekly helps builds anticipation, the waiting, the evolving discussion, the community that forms around that shared experience. I understand and enjoy those things too. Hell, one of my all time favorite things on Warming Glow is the weekly Game of Thrones discussion/dissection when the show is on. Change can be tough but I think everyone understands that this is going to be a good thing in the long run. And we can still have those things too, MR LIST suggested doing discussion threads for blocks of episodes like 1-3, great idea, totally doable.
Shows that get released this way are like bottles of liquor. You can pour a glass and enjoy it a little bit at a time or you can go through the whole thing at once to satisfy the craving but miss out on some of the finer details and nuances, but the important thing is that’s it’s your bottle, so enjoy how you wish.
Now having watched the first 3 episodes of House Of Cards I feel I can safely say that in this case, Netflix has handed us all a really nice bottle of Scotch (or whatever your favorite top shelf liquid is). Enjoy accordingly.