
The common definition of television is “a system for transmitting visual images and sound that are reproduced on screens, chiefly used to broadcast programs for entertainment,” but up until now, Nielsen’s definition of television only included those screens in your televisions, bedrooms, and in the cubbyhole of your kitchen. It didn’t matter that many — maybe most — of us now watch television on our tablets, smart phones, and laptops. However, starting in September, according to THR, Nieslen FINALLY expects to have hardware and software in place to capture viewership on our other devices that deliver video from streaming services such as Netflix and Amazon, or our X-Boxes and PlayStations. Video viewing on iPads and smart phones will also be fully incorporated by the end of the year.
It’s a huge step forward for Nielsen, and a much needed one with broadcast and cable networks beginning to grumble that the full viewership of their television programs were not being accounted for. We should see an immediate rise in the numbers of viewers, and my guess is that much of that will skew in favor TV shows geared toward younger audiences. Shows like Arrow, New Girl and Pretty Little Liars — which already have significant viewership on iTunes — will likely close the gap with older skewing shows like NCIS and CSI, although Modern Family and The Walking Dead will probably see even greater gains in relation to everything else.
The next step, I think, would be to erase the distinction between cable and broadcast television. Obviously, we can already compare one to another, but with shows like The Walking Dead regularly dominating broadcast ratings, and networks like NBC that place SEVENTH on certain nights behind cable networks, they should probably begin to be measured in relation to each other.
The change, for the record, won’t immediately allow us to know how many people are watching a show like House of Cards because Netflix still has to incorporate Nielsen ratings into their system.
Likewise, for what it’s worth, although the Emmy Awards have technically included services such as YouTube and Netflix for awards consideration since 2008, TV Guide posits that this year — thanks House of Cards and Arrested Development — may be the first in which shows that don’t air on conventional networks will receive Emmy nominations. Expect those changes to crowd out even more broadcast programs, which were already shut out of the drama competition at the most recent Emmys.
All of which is to say: It may be a good time to be a struggling broadcast network like NBC. They can be the first to adapt to the new landscape, give up the ridiculous notion to capture a broad swath of viewers, and focus on quality programming that will play well across all devices.
(Source)



And Community’s ratings jumped 3000% that day…
unfortunately
Unfortunately, that day was three months after it got canceled.
*cries*
I don’t think it’s ever a good time to be like NBC. They’ll find a way to ruin anything.
Gah. I expect to see this as CBS’ latest comedy:
“Grandpa’s a tax-hating conservative. His granddaughter is trying to save the environment. But their love keeps them family. Sunday dinner conversations will never be the same, at theirs and at yours. ‘Picket Signs’. Thursdays, this fall.”
Lulz at NBC making any kind of smart decision.
So, this will incorporate what EVERYONE watches? Or is it still the Nielsen Illuminati controlling television?
Oh, I read the article. Same people will still be making our TV decisions. Moving on.
Still only measuring 23K viewers, and won’t be adding more in connection with this change. Nielsen is the Britta (or is it, the NBC) of data-collection organizations.
I would slow down on saying that most of us watch TV on smartphones, tablets, and etc. I bet this isn’t going to change ratings that much. When you realize how many people in this country don’t even have high speed internet or cable, you will realize that adding in the numbers of people who do watch TV on other devices is just a small drop in a big bucket.
exactly i don’t know anyone who watches tv on anything but a tv
I don’t either really. I have the ability to watch TV on other devices, but for some reason I prefer to watch shows on something larger than an 3-8 inch screen.
i dont know anyone under 35 that watches tv live, thats the point of this. hulu, netflix, etc.
It’s a brave new world out there. I remember people thinking the VCR was a dumb idea “who would record a tc show”? And TiVo was insane “who records all that tv”?
all this does is skew the data to already awful shows
Even though I realize that Neilsen doesnt accurately assess viewership, its not really meant to do that anyway. Its meant to assess how much ad time is worth for each show. Usually the only people who are forced to watch ads are those who watch their tv shows live. So how effective is this change going to be in correctly analyzing how much a show can charge for ad time??
This is good news, but I still think that someone needs to analyze show ratings based on generated gifs per episode.
And I was hoping that one day Nielsen would be deemed irrelevant soon, but this just delays the inevitable. 95%+ of Americans have TV’s, in a few years they will all have some sort of wire attached to it and ratings can be determined by actual views. Who in their lifetime has ever even see a Neilsen box or know a family with one?
Me. I had one.
except for this guy above me, I have never heard of anyone, ever.
They were working on this three years ago when I had a box. I guess they finally got enough people for it to count.
How was it determined that your household was eligible for Neilsen?
@Timanator.. illuminate handshake
KNEW IT! actually their website claims “strictly by chance.” So I guess some asshole with the name Chance is a pretty big deal over at Neilsen.