
By now everyone knows that Klout is terrible. In fact, the only thing worse than Klout are the people who actually care about their Klout score. Thusfar in my life I’ve been fortunate enough to only have met one person who actually said the words, “What’s your Klout score?” in my presence and I literally laughed in his face — while also hoping that his car would tumble down a cliff later that night.
What makes Klout so horrendous — in addition to just being disgusting in theory and appealing to the saddest people in the world — is that its horsesh*t “algorithm” for “measuring influence” rewards people who tweet a lot. This is the dumbest f*cking thing this side of a Gallagher show. It just encourages people to be obnoxious Twitter users.
Who the hell wants to follow some prick who tweets nonsense every five seconds? Those are people you unfollow! They are the opposite of influencers. They’re…defluencers(?). No one should ever tweet unless they have something funny or interesting to say/share. Otherwise shutup and don’t clog your followers’ feeds up. In short, Klout basically encourages the worst people using social media to be even worse.
Take, for instance, this guy — Calvin Lee — mentioned in the journalistic blowjob Wired recently gave Klout. He exemplifies everything that is wrong with Klout and the people who care about it.
Calvin Lee is a graphic designer in Los Angeles with a Klout score of 74. He has received 63 Klout perks, scoring freebies like a Windows phone, an invitation to a VH1 awards show, and a promotional hoodie for the movie Contraband. To keep his score up, Lee tweets up to 45 times a day—an average of one every 32 minutes. “People like food porn,” he notes, “so I try to post a lot of pictures of things I eat.”
Lee once took a vacation during which he had no access to the Internet. This made him uncomfortable. “I was worried that brands couldn’t get in touch with me. It’s easy for them to forget about you. And I knew my Klout score would go down if I stopped tweeting for too long.” When he was loaned an Audi A8 for a few days as a Klout perk, Lee knew exactly where he wanted to drive it. He road-tripped from LA up to San Francisco, eventually arriving at the Klout offices and shaking hands with Joe Fernandez. Naturally he tweeted and hashtagged the entire journey.
I hope Calvin Lee — who follows 80,000 people on Twitter (following an impossible number of people for a human to actually follow is another way to raise your Klout score, naturally) — gets eaten by a grizzly bear. No, seriously, I really do.
But since the odds of that happening are sadly slim, I can at least take solace in knowing that Klouchbag is here to mock people like Calvin Lee, aka @mayhemstudios, and, of course, Klout itself.

While Klout measures influence on Twitter, Facebook, Google+, LinkedIn and Foursquare to assign its users scores from 0 to 100, Klouchebag calculates “how much of an asshat you are on Twitter.”
Klouchebag obviously mashes together two familiar words — Klout and douchebag.
Besides the guy who created Klouchebag — who says he did so in response to the Wired article I cited above, the only person with a perfect Klouchebag score of 100 is Piers Morgan.
Perfect.



I’m totally going to retweet this post on twitter.
I signed up for Klout after all this Klouchebag talk.
[i.imgur.com]
I don’t understand how Klout works
“its horsesh*t “algorithm” for “measuring influence” rewards people who tweet a lot.” – WRONG.
“following an impossible number of people for a human to actually follow is another way to raise your Klout score, naturally” – WRONG.
While your article has several hundred words, your two issues with Klout were tragically incorrect. Did you even bother research the Klout algorithm? Do you hold yourself to any type of journalistic integrity? Are you (and your publication) ok with a “journalist” making up facts to prove their flawed point?
Just curious.
So is this what it means to be a social media douchebag? You get on your pedastal and shout insults at others? About things you’re guessing at but didn’t actually put any time into researching. Did you read someone else’s article and thought you’d put your two cents in on a topic you know absolutely nothing about?
Speaking of which, Calvin’s a great guy. He’s quite friendly and pretty much open to meeting anyone who reaches out to him. I’ll ask you straight up then. Have you met him? Have you even tried to get in contact with him? Then why are you talking smack behind his back and issuing death threats?
Now tell me, does that qualify you as a douchebag?
Calvin Lee is a warm, gracious, funny man who would lend a hand to just about anyone who approaches him halfway decently. You are within your rights to dislike any SM platform out there but wishing a scary, violent death on Calvin in order to get max mileage on a post is just sad.
I am a firm believe in freedom of speech and I am not always in agreement with how
Klout operates, but this aggregation of words (I won’t dignify it by
calling it a blog post or even an article) that is a hateful, spiteful,
uninformed, piece of trash this side of anything coming out of North
Carolina’s voting population. Not to mention that they have chosen to
mess with one of my first Twitter friends (who would talk with me and teach me about Twitter and graphic arts back in the day) and who is nowa real-life dear friend
and one of the truly one of the sweetest and nicest people I know. The reason why he has so many followers and friends IRL and on the page.
All I
know is that the only douchebags on that site is the ignoramus (or ignorami) who wrote it
and the one who let it be published.
BUT, if you really want to know how I feel, I can sum it up this way – these dudes give
the word douchebag a bad name. And the only thing that’s buzzing are the flies around this pile of horsesh*t!
Maybe they should build a klout type of site that calculates how many overly sensitive people there are to be offended by this post’s freedom of opinion, which has a valid point. Klout is the dumbest f*cking thing this side of a Gallagher show.