
Despite numerous critics absolute trashing of Aaron Sorkin’s new HBO show, The Newsroom, I watched the pilot episode (which you can now watch in its entirety on YouTube) last night and actually liked it quite a bit. I particularly enjoyed the BP oil spill storyline (in what now seems like a past life entirely, I spent a year of my life covering that fiasco as a national affairs reporter for Yahoo!) and the control room scenes (personally, I’m more interested in the behind-the-scenes stuff involving the producers than I am the Will McAvoy character.) In the end, I figure that if I was willing to give Girls — awful, terrible, downright laughable in its lazy/atrocious writing/character development Girls — an extended shot to win me over, I owe Aaron Sorkin the same respect, despite obviously being a Charlotte.
But then I read about how he condescendingly and seemingly without reason talked down to a female reporter doing a piece on the show as “internet girl” (it was a piece for a newspaper) and I suddenly want to tune the show out — in effect telling Sorkin to go f*ck himself — sooooo bad.
This is how it started went when Toronto Globe and Mail writer Sarah Nicole Prickett met with Sorkin to interview him about The Newsroom, which she actually liked quite a bit…
I had to watch the show twice just to believe (a) how good that script was and (b) how incredibly convinced of its goodness, in every sense of “good,” it was.
Hence, my first question starts, “I watched the pilot twice … ” But I don’t get to the question part because Sorkin looks as if he wants to say something. I invite him to do so, and he asks, “Because you liked it so much the first time, or because you didn’t understand it the first time?”
WHOA…way to start off an interview by essentially implying that your interviewer may be a dullard who lacks the intellectual capacity to grasp a television show. Turns out, Pricky McPrickerson was just getting warmed up…
“Listen here, Internet girl,” he says, getting up. “It wouldn’t kill you to watch a film or pick up a newspaper once in a while.” I’m not sure how he’s forgotten that I am writing for a newspaper; looking over the publicist’s shoulder, I see that every reporter is from a print publication…I remind him. I say also, factually, “I have a New York Times subscription and an HBO subscription. Any other advice?”
He looks surprised, then high-fives me. Being not a person who high-fives or generally makes physical contact with interview subjects, I look more surprised.
“I’m sick of girls who don’t know how to high-five,” he says. He makes me try to do it “properly,” six times. He also makes me laugh; I’m nervous, and it’s so absurd. He loves it. He says, “Let me manhandle you.” Then he ambles off, hoping I’ll write something nice, as though he has never known how the news works, how many stories can be true.
So not only is Aaron an arrogant dinosaur with a head so far up his ass that he make Buzz Bissinger and David Simon look like internet visionaries, he’s apparently also a sexist and a misogynist. Who knew?
He helpfully drove that point home when he harkened back lovingly on a bygone era when women — not to mention people of color — weren’t offered the chance to play on the same field as white men.
“I think I would have done very well, as a writer, in the forties,” he says. “I think the last time America was a great country was then, or not long after. It was before Vietnam, before Watergate.”
Holy crap what an insufferable twat tornado! And one who lazily recycles his own dialogue — LIKE A GODFORSAKEN INTERNET BOY OR SOMETHING — at that…
(Whips out remote. Clicks on “series manager.” Begins to ponder canceling recordings of The Newsroom.)
Pic via Shutterstock



He recycled “Boo boo”? Why use that in the first place?
Writing a show about a network news broadcast in 2012 is like writing a show about beeper salesmen in 2005, or horse&buggy retailers in 1950.
The real tragedy in all this is that this uber-douche gets to dip his dick into Kristin Davis’ fine ass.
The moment I heard Sorkin was the writer was the moment I didn’t bother to watch it.
Yup and three minutes on the Sorkin Supercut sealed that forever.
Uuuugh. Sorkin is one of those people who’s such a massive ass that I can’t get past it. And he’s not even on screen.
Besides, it seems like he’s more interested in preaching to the choir ( because everyone who doesn’t like him is too stupid to get it) than writing something enjoyable.
dammit, I really enjoyed the pilot.
I’d like to say it was Jeff Bridge’s inspiring speech at the beginning, but frankly, I all I could think about was raising corgi puppies with that college co-ed.
Agreed, both on liking the pilot and the raising corgi’s with the co-ed.
One gripe (about almost all Sorkin prodcutions), the music is so in your face that it is apparent that he is trying to sometimes manufacture drama.
It’s simply a case of “don’t ever meet your heroes”. You’re doomed to disappointment.
I don’t know, I’ve read interviews much more uncomfortable than that. I think he did overstep his bounds with the “subscribe to a newspaper comment” but he did try to make up for it, awkwardly, but not really dickish in my opinion. Also, I don’t think he was trying to be racist, he was just nostalgic about the 40′s for some reason, just like how Own Wilson in Midnight in Paris longed to be in the 1920′s, not because he was sexist or misogynist. Oh also, it was Jeff Daniels…
Cajun, I want to punch you really hard for liking this and not Girls.
How can you not like Girls? Watch episode two from Newsroom; it will cement your feelings that Sorkin IS the douche that you suspect, as well as a pretty one-dimensional writer.