
We wouldn’t blame you if you haven’t been paying attention (there have been too many other important things to focus on this week, like this), but there’s an Internet storm a-brewing, and it’s getting ugly. On one side, there’s Gawker, your snarky source for all things gossip and Goatse. On the other, there’s Reddit. The two websites have never been big fans of one another, but things are particularly heated now, ever since Gawker writer Adrian Chen unmasked the “biggest troll on the web”: “Violentacrez,” less known as Michael Brutsch, best known as the guy behind “jailbait,” “beatingwomen,” and “creepshots,” which are exactly as disgusting as they sound.
Here’s what you should know, beginning with the Meet Joe Black sequel no one wanted, Meet Michael Brutsch.
If you are capable of being offended, Brutsch has almost certainly done something that would offend you, then did his best to rub your face in it. His speciality is distributing images of scantily-clad underage girls, but as Violentacrez he also issued an unending fountain of racism, porn, gore, misogyny, incest, and exotic abominations yet unnamed, all on the sprawling online community Reddit. At the time I called Brutsch, his latest project was moderating a new section of Reddit where users posted covert photos they had taken of women in public, usually close-ups of their asses or breasts, for a voyeuristic sexual thrill. It was called “Creepshots.” (Via)
For those of you who don’t know what “Creepshots” is, it has nothing to do with Radiohead. Shame. OK, imagine walking down the street and you see an attractive, unsuspecting woman wearing tight yoga pants. She probably wouldn’t mind if someone she’s never met takes a picture of her, right? I mean, thousands of Internet perverts are only going to creepily masturbate to her. She should be flattered. Plus, it’s that skank’s fault that she’s wearing something so enticing. Such is the mindset of “Creepshots” and “Jailbait” and the people who visit(ed — it’s since been banned) it. YOUR MOM COULD BE ON IT AND SHE’D NEVER EVEN KNOW. Chen writes:
Violentacrez and his fellow moderators worked hard to make sure every girl on jailbait was underage, diligently deleting any photos whose subjects seemed older than 16 or 17. Violentacrez himself posted hundreds of photos. Jailbait became one of Reddit’s most popular subreddits, generating millions of pageviews a month. “Jailbait” was for a time the second biggest search term bringing traffic to Reddit, after “Reddit.” Eventually, Jailbait landed on CNN, where Anderson Cooper called out Reddit for hosting it, and Violentacrez for creating it. The ensuing outcry led Reddit administrators to reluctantly ban Jailbait, and all sexually suggestive content featuring minors.
On the phone, Michael Brutsch insisted he is not a pedophile but was unapologetic about Jailbait. He compared the photos of underage girls he posted to Britney Spears’ sultry “Hit Me Baby One More Time” video. She was 16 at the time, he said—how was that different than what he was doing? Brutsch said he only reposted photos that he’d found elsewhere, mostly on 4chan, and that he promptly removed any outright child porn that was posted. (Via)
He looks exactly what you’d expect him to look like:

Like Fat Tommy Carcetti, in other words. Brutsch’s other subreddit work includes “N*ggerjailbait,” “Hitler,” and, predictably, “Jewmerica.” Redditors didn’t take too kindly to Chen’s expose, though, and even before the article was published last night, select moderators banned any and all Gawker articles from appearing on Reddit, a pageview goldmine of a website. This comes from /politics a few days ago:
As some of you may know, a prominent member of Reddit’s community, Violentacrez, deleted his account recently. This was as a result of a ‘journalist’ seeking out his personal information and threatening to publish it, which would have a significant impact on his life. You can read more about it here
As moderators, we feel that this type of behavior is completely intolerable. We volunteer our time on Reddit to make it a better place for the users, and should not be harassed and threatened for that. We should all be afraid of the threat of having our personal information investigated and spread around the internet if someone disagrees with you. Reddit prides itself on having a subreddit for everything, and no matter how much anyone may disapprove of what another user subscribes to, that is never a reason to threaten them.
As a result, the moderators of /r/politics have chosen to disallow links from the Gawker network until action is taken to correct this serious lack of ethics and integrity. (Via)
As if things weren’t already confusing enough, Jezebel (part of the Gawker Media online empire) published a much-read post about the Tumblr blog Predditors, “a collection of incriminating personal information — photos, social media accounts, screencaps of CreepShots posts — that [25-year-old founder 'Samantha'] plans on using to ‘out’ Redditors whom she considers sexual predators.” Example:

PHEW. Got all that? Basically what this comes down is: Brutsch doesn’t think he’s doing anything wrong because FREE SPEECH and the fact that he’s technically never published underage pornography, and Gawker’s trying to shame him, and therefore anyone else who’s thinking about or already has published hateful, misogynist, creepy things on the Internet, out of the game. But why does Brutsch do it?
“I just like riling people up in my spare time.” (Via)
I don’t really feel like being yet another shouting head about all this (see the Gawker comments section if those are your people), so for now, I’m just going to sit back, read Gawker, read the non-creepy parts of Reddit, and…

Oops, wrong GIF.

Yup, do nothing and eat popcorn. That’s my ideal Internet. No photos of underage girls would be good, too.



I’m conflicted. The stuff being posted by VA and others is disgusting, but yeah, is free speech, which I am a supporter of. I do however, hate Gawker and their over the top, anti-capitalism views, so I cant approve of anything they post outside of Jalopnik and Drew Magary’s stuff.
Free speech does not mean anonymity. You have the right to say what you want, but you don’t have the right to say things and hide from them.
Moreover, this isn’t government action, but rather, private individuals speaking out on all sides of issues. It’s a perfect paradigm of “bad speech – more speech”. And it’s entertaining.
Technically, isn’t outing someone “free speech” too?
People who say “Hey, I wanted what I do on the Internet to be a secret, no fair making it be NOT a secret” display a pretty fundamental misunderstanding of how the Internet works. We teach little children that what you do on the Internet has real life consequences. Reddit seems to be a bunch of babies.
I would read a site called corgi creepshots.
Have a think and ask yourself was gawker right to expose Mr Brutsch and if so what does this suggest about the direction of media and free speech going forward? Shouldn’t one be accountable for the their choices and actions as opposed to hiding behind a cloak of anonymity? Especially when there are real world repercussions at stake?
[scallywagandvagabond.com]
“Shouldn’t one be accountable for the their choices and actions as opposed to hiding behind a cloak of anonymity? Especially when there are real world repercussions at stake?”
Exactly. Eff that guy and anyone else who posts hateful or tasteless crap and then tries to hide anonymously. If you don’t want to be looked at as a douchebag or racist or perv, then you know, don’t post.
You reap what you sow, etc…..
Anyone who wants to defend free speech should do it publicly, not behind an anonymous internet pseudonym. These people get a perverse thrill out of posting this stuff, and rationalize it as free speech which is bullshit.
Bottom line is, if you are fearful of having your personal details exposed, then that should be a sign that what you are doing is wrong. There is a very real epidemic where the anonymity that the internet provides creates a detachment of responsibility for the user.
I know this is both soapboxy and hypocritical at the same time, which are two things I hate the most, so I apologize for that. But the internet should be about Corgis, and Youtube videos of soldiers surprising their families. The part that Brutsch exists in is wrong and people should not be defending him.
“Anyone who wants to defend free speech should do it publicly, not behind an anonymous internet pseudonym.”
I feel like sometimes there can be exceptions. /Publius
Say what you will, but “Jewmerica” does have a catchy ring to it.
The troll got mad at being trolled?
Bah! Both Gawker and Reddit are extremely dumb, I will stick with Uproxx and AVClub thank you.
I love your screen name and I’m filing it away in my memory for potential names for my future dream restaurant and/or food truck.
“Free speech”? Last I heard, the government didn’t out the troll.
If a self-policing community outs someone, that’s not violating that person’s rights.
And in the end, “free speech,” doesn’t mean “no consequences.” It means the government doesn’t restrict what you say.
Posting sexualized pictures of young girls and then getting exposed is not a governmental impingement of one’s free speech.
Agreed. Plus it seems like this guy is being burned by the same community he wants anonymity and free speech (his versions, anyway) for.
Take note, hipsters, this is true irony.
I kind of view this as being on the lines of Flag burning and allowing the KKK to march. If we want any good from internet anonymity we need to tolerate the bad as well. However, if you are going to troll you should do a better job covering your tracks.
LuLz “But we made a private website on the internet, that means we have rights within said website right….right?!”
I’m glad to see all those mouth breathing fatties shaking in their XXL Sponge Bob boxers. At least their mom is just a slow lumbering wheezing walk up stairs from the basement. Maybe she can console those precious little redditors with a McRib and a super sized Diet Coke.
There there little redditors. Dry those beady little child molester eyes, did I mention how your tears smell like Pringles potato chips. That must be why you get so hungry when you’re upset. Let me go get your favorite to help cheer you up. That’s right, a BBQ sauce milk shake.
I am not trying to defend the reddit guy, but I find gawker to be as self righteous and pompous as an I-Phone commercial and think that what they are doing is just as bad. They objectify and invade folks privacy for their own schadenfreude kicks.
Completely agree. Cant stand gawker. they sit on their high horse dedicating all of their time to completely ripping anyone they dont agree with politically and socially
I’m conflicted. On one hand, you have pompous bloggers who fill themselves with faux anger for hits and on the other, a bunch of circlejerk doofuses desperate for upvotes. No one wins here. Let’s stop being distracted by the free speech comment and have more Alison Brie gifs.
It’s all well and good if these tactics are only used for righteous purposes (i.e. to out internet pedophiles, and the like), but in the wrong hands, it could get pretty fucked. Unintended consequences.
Say, if ultra-right-wing nut bags start revealing the identities of people they disagree with, or the turriss start posting the names and addresses of everyone who has ever made fun of Muhammad on the internet, we’re talking targeted assassinations and truck bombs. Abortion doctors, atheists, and comedians be damned.
“if ultra-right-wing nut bags start revealing the identities of people they disagree with”
Like who – President Obama and Rachel Maddox? Or, what, your employer gets a tip-off that you’ve been quoting Richard Dawkins on a message board?
@/Dingus, no special tactics were used. As facebook users are learning, there is no such thing as privacy on the internet. Abortion doctors do get their information shared. Most people will not be exposed because they simply aren’t important enough for anyone to care that much. When someone’s anonymity is being guarded for noble reasons white hat techs will help protect them but they are still taking a chance they will be exposed. When someone is just being a troll and is out to exploit and harm as many people as possible there is no reason to protect them. They are not doing anything noble that the community should defend. They still have free speech. Being held accountable for what you say is not unfair.