
Microprocessors are so deeply integrated into our lives, we’ve pretty much completely stopped noticing them. But they’re always there, affecting our lives in some surprising ways. Sure, they’re in your smartphone and computer — but also your toaster, your stove, your TV, your car and just about everywhere else. That’s because, as processor technology has advanced, making processors that ten years ago would have cost a fortune and be possessed of mind-blowing power are now so cheap and disposable that people shove them into just about anything that needs a “brain” without a second thought.
But what if microprocessors somehow pulled a George Bailey and just…stopped existing? Beyond obvious things, like having to fill out carbon paper forms to get pencils at work and no Internet, how else would they affect your life? What would change? What would become harder? What would become more expensive?
We decided to break out the consequences to the world without the microprocessor, and it’s a lot more than just having to actually attend meetings instead of just getting the email update when you pretend to have something else to do. Take a look and see for yourself how different (and difficult) life would be without them…

With support from our partner, Intel, we’re exploring the technology and tools that unleash the creativity and productivity of today’s content creators. Intel is committed to improving our lives with easy to use, efficient technology. Their goal is to develop tools that help put technology in the hands of everyone.





One thing missed is manufacturing. Many machines used in manufacturing use processors for everything from calibration, safety mechanisms, run cycles and automation. Cost of finished goods would be much higher.
That infographic was heavy on graphics, light on info.
Yeah, but we’ll still have springs, right?
NO SPRINGS!
COME BACK, ZINC, COME BACK!
Huh. A partner post that doesn’t mention the partner until the end. That’s nice.
I hope it ruined your day.
I larned fram tha dapahted that microwprawsessahs ah wicked impartant and that tha chinese wannem.
well that was just silly.
The excuse that print is dying because of ipads is bogus, case in point: Had a meeting with a pretty mainstream science magazine in New York, he said that since they introduced their ipad version, the print version didnt drop. infact their subscribers have more than doubled. That shows that all their old print customers aren’t all not buying the print version, just that now more casual digital savvy readers are now also reading them.
That’s kind of a narrow-minded view of how tablets and the like can destroy print media. It’s not necessarily that people are opting for the digital versions of the same publications, but rather that the information or entertainment that they used to seek through paper means is available in a bevy of other ways on electronic devices, and generally for free.
Well, for one, this would be Google Vision.
What ever we are doing Even
what is posted here is
not possible without MICROPROCESSORS